Epstein Secrets

gument in his consolidated appeals from Judge Donald Hafele's March 8, 2018 rulings which resulted in two non-final orders, (1) granting Respondent Bradley J. Edwards' Motion for Separate Trials and (2) denying Petitioner's Motion to Remove Case from Trial Docket in Order to Comply with the Mandate in Rule 1.440.

"exempts only cross-claims from the determination of when an action is at issue."). The issues raised in these consolidated appeals were created by Edwards' eleventh-hour misuse of Rule 1.440 in a maneuvering effort to achieve severance or bifurcation of his counterclaim from the original claim filed b

efore Rule 1.440 was "waived [by] the aggrieved party who appear[ed] at trial and raise[d] no objection to the noncompliance"); Genuine Pans Co. v. Parsons, 917 So. 2d 419, 421 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)(issuing a writ of mandamus to enforce strict toning of Rule 1.440(c)); Gawker Media, LLC v. Bollea, 170 So

plaintiff/counter-defendant below, challenges the circuit court's Order entered March 8, 2018' by the Honorable Donald Hafele, granting Respondent Bradley J. Edwards' Motion for Separate Trials.'' By separate motion, Petitioner moves to consolidate this petition with his pending Emergency Petition for Writ of Man

admittedly running a $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme by convincing investors he had negotiated multi-million settlements in high-profile cases. Three of Edwards' clients at the time alleged tort claims against Epstein, which Epstein ultimately settled. Based on publicly available information about 3 All bac

he terms of rule 1.440, including its mandated fifty-day hiatus between the service of the last pleading and the trial date."); Genuine Pans Co. v. Parsons, 917 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (granting mandamus to enforce Rule 1.440(c), which prohibits the setting of a trial less than thirty days after

DISTRICT Appellate Case No.: LT Case No: 502009CA0408003OOOCMB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Respondents/Defendants. EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS On Review of a Non-Final Order of the Circuit Court of the Fifteen

ocess d. (4) Fraud e. (5) Conspiracy to Commit Fraud (App. 1). On December 21, 2009, just 17 days after Epstein instituted the civil proceeding, Edwards filed a Counterclaim for abuse of process against Epstein. (App. 2). Thereafter, Edwards amended his Counterclaim several times, ultimately allegi

the setting of a trial under rule 1.440." Campbell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 204 So. 3d 476, 479 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (citing Genuine Parts Co. v. Parsons, 917 So. 2d 419, 421 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) and Gawker Media, LLC v. Bollea, 170 So. 3d 125, 130 (Ha. 2d DCA 2015)). I In compliance with this Court's

DISTRICT Appellate Case No.: LT Case No: 502009CA0408003OOOCMB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Respondents/Defendants. EMERGENCY MOTION FOR REVIEW OF ORDER DENYING STAY Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(0,

is case on August 9, 2010. (App. 5). 2 EFTA00793768 (App. 1). On December 21, 2009, just 17 days after Epstein instituted the civil proceeding, Edwards filed a Counterclaim for abuse of process against Epstein. (App. 2). Thereafter, Edwards amended his Counterclaim several times, ultimately allegi

e terms of rule 1.440, including its mandated fifty-day hiatus between the service of the last pleading and the trial date."); Genuine Parts Co. v. Parsons, 917 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (granting mandamus to enforce Rule 1.440(c), which prohibits the setting of a trial less than thirty days after

Epstein's at- torney moving to appeal. "Any chance to stall in any way and keep the agreement out of public disclosure, they will take it," said Edwards outside court. He will have served about 13 months of an 18-month sentence. . Epstein pleaded guilty nearly one year ago to solicitation of pr

king a federal judge to appoint a receiver to take over Epstein's property to prevent him from hiding or transferring assets abroad. Ca PRINTTHIS Bradley Edwards also has asked that the receiver order Epstein post a $15 million bond to ensure money is available if the women prevail in their lawsuits seeking d

itant to book far in advance. "People are definitely becoming more impulse-driven," he said. if you still want to go somewhere before mid-August, Parsons says buy your tickets now. It's unlikely the deals will get any better. After that it's another story. Parsons says airlines haven't started seri

member telling them that you're not safe because you're talking about this? MR. PAGLIUCA: Object to form and foundation. THE WITNESS: Yes. BY MR. EDWARDS: Q. And that you had heard Jeffrey Epstein making threats to people on the telephone? MR. PAGLIUCA: Object to form and foundation. 3 EFTA00595615

tz 383 S. University Street BOLES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP Salt Lake it UT 4112 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 Ft. Lauderdale FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale. FL 33301 J. Stanley Pottinger 49 Twin L

made by third persons under no business duty to report may not." United States v. Pazsint, 703 F.2d 420, 424 (9 Cir.I983) (emphasis in original). Parsons v. Honeywell, Inc., 929 F.2d 901, 907 (2d Cir. 1991)(quoting United States v. Pazsint, 703 F.2d 420, 424 (9[th] Cir.I983)). Plaintiff does not addr