Epstein Secrets

stand. 13 order that he entered. And I'll quote fron it. I) Good afternoon. Jack Goldberger on behalf of la This is Order on Counter-plaintiff Bradley Edwards' la Mr. Epstein. 14 Motion to Deternine Status of Punitive Damage IS Your Honor, as a general statement of the lax, Is Discovery and Applicabi

Y EDWARDS, individually, , going to hoar? boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs. 10 THE COURT: Yes. My understanding as I left / 11 Was going to be Edwards' Second Supplement to TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS 12 Motion in Lunine Addressing Scope of Admissible I) Evidence, and of course in that same vein

uct privileged 14 bearing the expense to turn these docunents over to is materials. So Judge Carney was appointed a special IS Earner Jaffe and Bred Edwards for purposes of it master to make a determination as to what should 16 preparing a privilege log. 17 and could be turned over and report back t

happened. 3 as importantly, both aides are adequately prepared 5 when the trustee took over the tiles, there 6 so that, as I mentioned in this Pollard case, no 4 wan an understanding by Hr. Edwards and his firm 7 ono is unduly surprised by something that cones 7 that [hove would to about 5,000

stand. 13 order that he entered. And I'll quote fron it. I) Good afternoon. Jack Goldberger on behalf of la This is Order on Counter-plaintiff Bradley Edwards' la Mr. Epstein. 14 Motion to Deternine Status of Punitive Damage IS Your Honor, as a general statement of the lax, Is Discovery and Applicabi

last wok just 4 and Any Reference to Docunenta Containing 4 So my suggestion to your Honor is that wo deal 5 Privileged Materials, Listed on Edwards' Privilege o first with the procedural issue because, as I said, 4 Log. 4 that will narrow issue. significantly. And then / MR. SCAROER: Yes,

uct privileged 14 bearing the expense to turn these docunents over to is materials. So Judge Carney was appointed a special IS Earner Jaffe and Bred Edwards for purposes of it master to make a determination as to what should 16 preparing a privilege log. 17 and could be turned over and report back t

happened. 3 as importantly, both aides are adequately prepared 5 when the trustee took over the tiles, there 6 so that, as I mentioned in this Pollard case, no 4 wan an understanding by Hr. Edwards and his firm 7 ono is unduly surprised by something that cones 7 that [hove would to about 5,000

SCAROLA: Thank you, air. Your Honor, have uo decided what notions we're going to hoar? THE COURT: Yes. My understanding as I la;' was going to be Edwards' Second Supplement to Motion in Lamine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence, and of course in that sane vein roster'. Notice of Service of Unre

nderstand that. I otherwise, the Court retains jurisdiction to award 9 THE COURT: Titoorder eays that Fowler Mit. sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad Edwards or his 10 will not retain any copies of 0he documents .1 client," end quote. 1i contained on the disk provided to it nor shall any • MR. LIN

d what happened. as Importantly, both sides are adequately prepared t When the trustee took over the files, [hare so that, as I nentionod in this Pollard case, no 4 was an understanding by Kr. Edwards and his firm one is unduly surprised by something that COM102 7 that there would be about 5,000 e

onstitutional basis for precluding trial of criminal case by injunction. Melvin L. Klafter, Leonard R. Harten- feld, Chicago, Ill., for appellant. Edward,. Hanrahan, U. S. Atty., John Peter Lulinski, Thomas W. James, Asst. U. S. Attys., Chicago, Ill., William W. Goodrich, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Joanne

3, 925 (N.D. 111.1964) (motion to quash grand jury subpoe. nas). EFTA00191855 808 770 FEDERAL REPORTER, 2d SERIES "reasonable basis" standard. Pollard, 283 FSupp. at 258; Reporters Committee, 693 F2d at 1064. See also Bran:burg v. Hayes; 408 U.S. 665, 699-01, 707-08, 92 S.Ct. 2646, 2665-66, 2669