Epstein Secrets

an arbitration demand in March 2012, in June 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was t=e source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. I tell=you this in the spirit of resoution, my understandi

largely ministerial actio=s ? the court also disallowed some of your costs on their own, . in addition only on April 3 in an email to my lawyers, Lance indicated that his fees were only $4,115. =br> Michael, as I said, I would like to resolve this matter, . getting th= facts straight will go a long

ceived only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance off=red to accept $150,000. 4. you stated you were operating under the 2005 A=reement? were the invoices addressed to roy? or to jay? was the paym

(Final Aug. 16. 2007) -Compilation DVD Made by -Video Depositions (Could use in Brad Edwards Case) Bill Riley Investigations Sent to Mike Tein and Roy Black MERRIE SPAETH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. MERRIE SPAETH CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT PBL INVOICES CIVIL CASES NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT AMERICAN HOME ASS

Judgment -Release & Confidentiality Agreement Signed March 25, 2009 EFTA00300508 -Notice of Nonmonetary determination or Redetermination/Ltr from Lance and other workers (etc) FT Real Estate. Inc. Operating File 1. Purchase of Bolongo Estate 2. Bolongo Estate Insurance 3. Purchase of Fish Hawk M

an arbitration demand in March 2012, in June 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was the source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arb

eived only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance offered to accept $150,000. 4. If you were operating under the 2005 Agreement were the invoices addressed to roy or to jay? was the payment you re

an arbitration demand in March 2012, in June 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was the source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. I tell you this in the spirit of resoution, my understandi

ceived only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance offered to accept $150,000. 4. you stated you were operating under the 2005 Agreement? were the invoices addressed to roy? or to jay? was the pay

an arbitration demand in March 2012, in June 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was the source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. I tell you this in the spirit of resoution, my understandi

ceived only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance offered to accept $150,000. 3 EFTA_R1_01306408 EFTA02341103 4. you stated you were operating under the 2005 Agreement? were the invoices addres

an arbitration demand in March 2012, in June 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was the source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. I tell you this in the spirit of resoution, my understandi

ceived only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance offered to accept $150,000. 4. you stated you were operating under the 2005 Agreement? were the invoices addressed to roy? or to jay? was the paym

an arbitration demand in March 2012, in June 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was the source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. I tell you this in the spirit of resoution, my understandi

ceived only on April 3 from your lawyer, Lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance offered to accept $150,000. 3 EFTA_R1_01632846 EFTA02503828 4. you stated you were operating under the 2005 Agreement? were the invoices addres

an arbitration demand in March 2012, in J=ne 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was t=e source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arb

ceived only on April 3 from your lawyer, lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance off=red to accept $150,000. 4. If you were operating under the 2005 Agreement =were the invoices addressed to roy or to jay? was the pa=ment you re

rn District of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave. West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. July 22, 2011 EMAIL ADDRESSES: MIN Roy Black forwarded to me your letter to him dated July 21, 2011, from the District Attorney of the County of New York. We thank you for providing notice of t

gram emPhadoing intombe supervision with 24-frotr per-day electronic monitoring. Criminal Tarantino caMintrilty control status roust InTcludo cured Lance and may Include oder measures normally ainectotrad with community control, except that specific comfitions necessary to monitor this population may