Epstein Secrets

And shouldn't the victims credibility be a factor to determine whether a crimes been committed, not wheth- er a jury will convict? (After all, as Mt Goldberger told The Palm Beach Post of Mt Epstein, "Ha never de- nied girls came to the house.") Especially, I asked Mt Edmond- son to explain: Why shouldn't

charge is typically made in a criminal information—an alternative 53 an indictment charging a person with the commission of a at. His attorney, Jack Goldberger. declined to discuss the charge. State attorneys of- fice spokesman Mike Edmonton also had little to say. Generally speak- llPshda ing, there i

d the allegations wholly unsubstantiated and not medibie.' and that's why his client was not charged with sexual activity with minors, he said. Goldberger said Epstein passed a lie detector test ad- ministered by a reputable polygraph examiner in which he said he did not know the girls were minors.

s occurred, there is sufficient probable cause to charge Jeffrey Epstein with four counts of Unlawful Sexual Activity with a Minor, in violation of Florida State Statute 794.05(1), a second degree felony. As Epstein, who at the time of the incident was fifty two years of age, did use a of. a fourteen year old minor, there

found the allegations wholly unsubstantiated and not credible,” and that’s why his client was not charged with sexual activity with minors, he said. Goldberger said Epstein passed a lie detector test ad- ministered by a reputable ‘ polygraph examiner in which he said he did not know the ‘girls were minors

cause of sheer embarrass- ment,” he said. “But she very much looked 14. Any prudent man would have had second thoughts about that.” Defense attorney Jack - Goldberger maintains that not only did Epstein pass a polygraph test showing he | did not know the girls were minors, but their stories weren’t credible. The

is occurred, there is sufficient probable cause to charge Jeffrey Epstein with four counts of Unlawful Sexual Activity with a Minor, in violation of Florida State Statute 794.05(1), a second degree felony. As Epstein, who at the time — of the incident was fifty two years of age, did use a vibrator on the external vaginal area

e investigators following him to observe his daily activities. I also explained to him that there was a meeting scheduled with ASA . and Attorney Jack Goldberger at Mr. Krischer's office scheduled on June 1, 2006 at 9:00 am. I attempted to call ASA to inform her of the private investigators following Mr a

No • 1-05-000368 (Continued) has been taken off the Jeffrey Epstein case because her husband is employed with Attorney Jack Goldberger. Attorney Goldberger is the attorney of record for Jeffrey Epstein. His previous attorney, Guy Fronstin, has been fired fromL2pEesentation. ASA has been assigned

s occurred, there is sufficient probable cause to charge Jeffrey Epstein with four counts of Unlawful Sexual Activity with a Minor, in violation of Florida State Statute 794.05(1), a second degreefelony. As Epstein, who at the time of the incident was fifty two years of age, did use a vibrator on the external vaginal area ofS

e the list to the Federal Grand Jury investigation and thus to the non- disclosure provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). On July 8, 2008, you wrote to Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., and informed him that on June 30, 2008, "the United States Attorney's Office provided [him] with a list of thirty-one individuals 'whom it wa

ry, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 250 Australian Ave S. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Goldberger: Pursuant to the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida hereby provides y

his occurred, there is sufficient probable cause to charge le y Epstein with four counts of Unlawful Sexual Activity with a Minor, in violation of Florida State Statute 794.05(1), a second degree felony. As Epstein, who at the time of the incident was fifty two years of age, did use a vibrator on the external vaginal area of