Epstein Secrets

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Jack A. Goldberger Atterbur , Goldber . er & Weiss, P.A. - Paul Cassell Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter

k Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Jack A. Goldberger Atterbur , Goldber . er & Weiss, P.A. - Paul C

onal Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special Master [Sealed] [D.E. 1252] 4/4/18 Epstein's Supplement and Specific Request for in Camera Review to Determine Relevance, Inapplicability and/or Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product With Regard to Sealed Documents [D.E.

; send draft to D. Indyke for review; work on Notice re J. Epstein's trial testimony; work on new dates for J. Epstein's deposition; follow up with J. Goldberger, D. Indyke and C. Pugatch re proposed new dates EFTA00799184 Client Ref: 0002 - 0001 Invoice # 1034 Date Services 07/11/18 SJL Telephone co

SJL Work on bankruptcy opening statement; work on Declaration of S. Link; work on Declaration of .1 Epstein; telephone conference with J. Epstein, J. Goldberger and D. Indyke; work on arguments for upcoming hearing; review multiple Responses filed by B. Edwards and follow up with client and D. Indyke re sa

d federal case law cited in J. Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Privileged Nature of Documents and with Specific Request for in Camera Review to Determine Relevance, Inapplicability, and Waiver, Plaintiffs Response thereto, and our Supplement thereto on the issues of "issue injection' an

lephone conferences and communications with D. Indyke and J. Epstein re same; follow up on hearing schedule; trial team meeting with J. Goldberger, M. Goldberger, J. Caldwell, T. Campbell, R. Glasser and K. Rockenbach re trial work, hearing preparations and strategies; work on objections to B. Edwards' depo

/18 PVD [Ne -ci analysis of production re( 03/16/18 PVD [N locket for chronology of pri .ss. .vork on updating same 03/16/18 KBR le' or In Camera Review of " trict Court of Appeal de :arch re all r. 90.702, work-product pr inethical behavior, is; onse in Opposition to Pr eider from the Fo