Epstein Secrets

s of these privileged documents?," counsel for Epstein replied, "I just said my client. My law firm and my client. And I can say legal counsel, Mr. Goldberger. So that's it." Hearing Trans. 64:14-19. 30. During the hearing, counsel for Epstein (Link and Rockenbach) also revealed that Fowler White was dis

aw.com 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: 561-727-3600 Fax: 561-727-3601 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. [email protected]; [email protected] Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401

orneys at the law firm of Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White")—would make a copy of the materials and return them to Fanner Jaffe. Because of Fanner Jaffe's obvious concern that 1 EFTA00799314 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6323 Filed 03/19/18 Page 2 of 23 Epstein or his legal counsel might misappropriate

ain any 21 replied, I just said my client, my law firm and my client, 22 imagines or copies of said documents. 22 and I can say legal counsel, Mr. Goldberger. So, that's 23 UNIDENTIFIED: Or otherwise, on it's 23 it. 24 computer or otherwise. 24 So we now know that this information that 25 MR. EDWAR

ended up with the order that we're talking 14 about today. IS Another point of clarification, Mr. Scarola 16 says that the order was entered over Fanner Jaffe's 17 objection. He may have had some — the law firm may have 18 had some concerns, but it's very clear it's an agreed 19 order. I don't know that th

cuments or the contents of these privileged documents? MR. LINK: I just said my client. My law firm and my client And I can say legal counsel, Mr. Goldberger. So that's it. MR. SCAROLA: That may require some further relief that we can address at another time. And so that the record is clear, your Honor,

issues. DE 6353 at 5-6. This argument does not address the more basic attorney-client privileges, which have never been waived in any way. But, as Fanner Jaffe's briefing clearly explains, there has never been any waiver — either of attorney-client privilege or work-product protection — over the "key emails"