Epstein Secrets

cy — htto://www.searcvlawcom/CIIRISTIANDSEARCY/tabid/935/def aultaspzt Lake Lytal, Jr. — http://wwvv.hrtalreitencorn/index.php?vaae id=37 Talk to Jack Goldberger about this group. They are all very good personal injury lawyers, but I have concerns about whether there would be an inherent tension because they

rtalreitencorn/index.php?vaae id=37 Talk to Jack Goldberger about this group. They are all very good persona

48 FAX 405 530 6440 szmwrivs OFFICE in mid Auguet2007,yote defense team, dissatisfied with my staffs review oldie case, asked to meet with me. Mr. Lamle indicated your busy schedule, and asked me to put off until September 7,2007, so that you could attend. Mr. Leflcowitz also Skated that he might app

GOLDBERGER a WEISS. P.A. e 1400 Iv would be unacceptable, that specific individual 17 lo exhibits needed to be listed. I'n sure your Honor By JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE :5 has a recollection of these circumstances. And 18 29 21 that, obviously, is a fairly standard order that S0 31 your Honor adheres

fling 17 Mr. Link's law flat, the Fowler Mite law firm, I 17 that request on behalf of my clients. is is believe there are several others, Mr. Goldterger's law firm, we want then all co canvass their 1$ 19 We're told that Mr. Goldberger has seen it, we're told Mr. Epstein ha0 seen it. We want to

ing that we have asked them to destroy then. 2 THE COURT: I'm here only to deal with this 2 We want then turned over to the Court under seal. 3 Lamle that in before so; and that is, whether a 3 They should no longer have possession of those 6 wholesale late disclosure of ➢ignificant exhibits 4

4 1a disclosed would net be penn/Lted CO be used at. 25 For Jeffrey Epstein: 17 trial. You rude it clear that catchall listings 16 ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER a WEISS, P.A. 1ca would be unacceptable; that specific Individual 17 lo exhibits needed to be listed. I'n sure your Honor By JACK A. GOLDBERGER

ERBURY, GOLDBERGER a WEISS, P.A. 1ca would be unacceptable; that specific Individual 17 lo exhibits needed to be listed. I'n sure your Honor By JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE 25 has a recollection of these circumstances. And 10 29 21 that, obviously, is a fairly standard order that S0 31 your Honor adhere

ing that we have asked them to destroy then. 2 THE COURT: I'm here only to deal with this 2 We want then turned over to the Court under seal. 3 Lamle that in before so; and that is, whether a 3 They should no longer have possession of those 6 wholesale late disclosure of ➢ignificant exhibits 4