Epstein Secrets

the undersigned and his criminal attorney, Jack Goldberger, Esq., and both were present for the above depos

r. Epstein was in attendance for said deposition. 2. Mr. Epstein is represented in this action by both the undersigned and his criminal attorney, Jack Goldberger, Esq., and both were present for the above deposition. 3. Spencer Kuvin, counsel for Plaintiff, E., was the attorney scheduled to take Mr. Epstei

on of discovered information before trial is not the kind of classic prior restraint that requires exacting first Amendment scrutiny." Id. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, M.D., 734 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(any order restraining press access must consider less restrictive alternatives including, but not limited

his day of May, 2011 to: Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices

h Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Au

991). 16. The foregoing authorities make perfectly clear that in appropriate cases extrajudicial statements can and should be prohibited. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, 734 So. 2d 1162, 1164-65 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (proper for a court to determine on a case-by-case basis whether good cause is shown to impose limitat

his day of May, 2011 to: Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 - 10 - FOIVLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA, 1395 B

h Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Au

991). 16. The foregoing authorities make perfectly clear that in appropriate cases extrajudicial statements can and should be prohibited. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, 734 So. 2d 1162, 1164-65 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (proper for a court to determine on a case-by-case basis whether good cause is shown to impose limitat