Epstein Secrets

kenbach, Esq. Rachel J. Glasser, Esq. LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Ste. 301 h, Florida 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. KITERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Ste. 1400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein 30 Marc

ida 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. KITERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250

15 EFTA00808533 C. Epstein Waived the Right to Rely on Rule 1.440 Epstein has waived reliance on Rule 1.440. As discussed above, Epstein filed the Second Amended Complaint on August 22, 2011. Rothstein never answered the complaint. Pursuant to Rule 1.500(a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, it was incumbent upon Epst

Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik o- ounse or e en an ounter- 01 1 1 ard, Suite 700 ounse or e en ant Scott Rothstein Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Jack A. Goldberger WA HAND DELIVERY Atterbu , Goldber er & Weiss, P.A. The Honorable Donald W. Hafele uite 1400 Palm Beach County Courthouse 1 205 N. Dixie Highw

Rothstein Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Jack A. Goldberger WA HAND DELIVERY Atterbu , Goldber er & Weiss,

Edwards filed a "Supplement" to his Motion for Separate Trials (App. 15). In his Supplement, Edwards advised for the first time that no default on the Second Amended Complaint had been entered in Epstein's case against Rothstein. In other words, at the time Edwards filed his motion to set case for trial, 7 EFTA00793699

er LLC o- ounse or ee nt ounter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Marc S. Nurik . Nurik yard, Suite 700 01 Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Jack A. Goldberger Atterbur , Goldber er & Weiss, P.A. Suite 1400 01 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein VIA U.S. MAIL ONLY The Honorable

1 Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Jack A. Goldberger Atterbur , Goldber er & Weiss, P.A. Suite 1400

recognized the case was not at issue at the time the motion to 5 Epstein simultaneously filed his Motion for Default Against Defendant Rothstein on the Second Amended Complaint. (App. 17). Pursuant to Rule 1.440, the "action" will be at issue 20 days after the circuit court grants Epstein's motion for default. Thereafter,

R 8 WEISS, P.A. 18 just take 10 seconds to present. 19 I'm here pro hac vice, which I'm not 18 20 sure the Court is concerned about. Wo do By JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE 19 21 have a notion to seal the pleading and 10 22 related mails. It's unopposed. We ask li 22 23 that it bo granted. Temporarily

8,9,13 24:15 25:5 38:12 42:5,12 45:13 47:2 48:4 55:18 56:22 58:21 62:18 62:24 63:1,16 64:4 65:21,22 66:2 72:15 76:14 77:15 78:23 80:12 89:1 GOLDBERGER 2:17,18 good 3:1 4:8,16 5:4 51:24 73:18 82:20 gosh 10:24 grant 39:10 48:3 54:18 78:7 granted 4:23 granting 88:3,7 gravity 3:10 great 7:25 3

longer applied. Mr. Edwards pointed out to this Court and to Mr. Epstein -- he is absolutely correct -- that Mr. Epstein's operative complaint is the Second Amended Complaint to which there is no default. What rule 2.440 tolls this Court to do is to look at the time that Mr. Edwards moved -- it's maybe a notice to set

melstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 Co-Cou

877 Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australi

522 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2009 Page 3 of 4 Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Page 3 Defendant to respond to the Second Amended Complaint. Robert D. •ritton, Jr. Attorney f r Defendant Epstein Certificate of Se ce I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronicall

day of October, 2011 to: Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices

h Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Au

ended Complaint which contained a single count against Edwards for abuse of process, and a single count against Rothstein. Edwards moved to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. At the September 28, 2011 hearing on Edwards' motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, the Court explained that abuse of process required -

y Epstein Jack A. Goldber er, Esquire Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 Wes

ded Complaint, which was filed on August 21, 2011. 4. Edwards, however, is not a party to that case as Epstein voluntarily dismissed Edwards from the Second Amended Complaint on August 16, 2012.' That point alone nullifies Epstein's entire argument that Edwards' Motion to Set Case for Trial was not ripe. Rule 1.440(b), o

00 01 ounse or e e nt Scott Rothstein Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Suite 1400

m., in a "Supplement" to his Motion for Separate Trials filed just the day before (App. 14), Edwards asserted for the first time that no default on the Second Amended Complaint had been entered in Epstein's case against Rothstein. In other words, at the time Edwards filed his motion to set case for trial, the case was not