Epstein Secrets

each Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Esq. 250 Australian Ave. South, Ste. 1400 West

lints:led to: 4 O. a RAFELE CIRC. is JUDGE nit tit.. EFTA00617982 Jack Scarola, Esq. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Esq. 250 Australian Ave. South, Ste. 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd., Ste. 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 B

Beach, FL 33401 ittck x Scam] i sE u r e • Inca Searcy Denney Scuola et al 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Atterbury, Goldberger & 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esquire 1 East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale FL 301 Bradley

es." Downs v. Coastal Sys. Int?, Inc., 972 So. 2d 258, 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (citing Vines v. Mathis, 867 So.2d 548 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)). See also McMahan v. Toto, 311 F.3d 1077,1083 (11th Cir. 2002). An offer of judgment is typically deemed to be a "bad faith" offer when it is a nominal amount in lig

g to Epstein's attorney. 'The embarrassment on the prosecutor's face was evident when the police officer never showed up for the meeting," attorney Jack Goldberger said. Later in April, Recarey walked into a prosecutor's office at the state attorneys office and learned the case was taking an unexpected turn.

into the Palm Beach County Jail early July 23 and released hours later. Epstein's legal team -doesn't dispute that he had girls over for massages," Goldberger said. But he said their claims that they had sexual encounters with him lack credibility. 'They are incapable of being believed," he said. "They ha

Meanwhile, Epstein's powerful friends have remained silent as tabloids and Internet blogs feast on the public details of the police investigation. n Goldberger maintains Epstein's innocence but says the legal team has not ruled out a future plea deal. He insists Epstein will emerge in the end with his reput

day she married another man, Sargent Schutt, in 1999. After breaking off their affair for a few years, Linda testified that it started up again when McMahan brought her to Fisher Island to recuperate after an illness." • "Most gruesomely, Schutt discovered a vibrator in Linda's luggage after one of her

nage girls to vis- it Epstein for massages and sexual activity, Palm Beach police said, and presumably would be a key witness. Epstein's attorney Jack Goldberger did not return phone messages. A source close to the case suggested it is languishing pending a decision by the FBI on whether to refer it to f

the allegations wholly unsubstantiated and not credible," and that's why his client was not charged with sexual activity with minors, he said. Goldberger said Epstein passed a lie detector test ad- ministered by a reputable polygraph examiner in which he said he did not know the girls were minors.

tein's Friends and Neighbors The "froward- paha Beach New Tipples his a It:rarity disgusting SU" about a local nultinlithorlatrc ranted 1). J.Irucc McMahan who. al the as of 65. married his 35-ver..r-oki daughter. Linda Mane Hodge McMahan Schott. We'd rather :tot go into the ciehtilt; (live for the hit

VICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd.

each Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Au

s." Downs v. Coastal Sys. Int'l, Inc., 972 So. 2d 258, 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (citing Vines v. Mathis, 867 So.2d 548 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)). See also McMahan v. Toto, 311 F.3d 1077,1083 (11th Cir. 2002). An offer ofjudgment is typically deemed to be a "bad faith" offer when it is a nominal amount in light

Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Gok)erfit. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 14

es." Downs v. Coastal Sys. Int'l, Inc., 972 So. 2d 258, 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (citing Vines v. Mathis, 867 So.2d 548 (Ha. 1st DCA 2004)). See also McMahan v. Toto, 311 F.3d 1077,1083 (11th Cir. 2002). An offer of judgment is typically deemed to be a "bad faith" offer when it is a nominal amount in lig