Epstein Secrets

each Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Au

s April 28, 2013. Electronic Service List Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd.

he onus of supplying the information or documents is inordinate." Topp Telecom, Inc. v. Atkins, 763 So. 2d 1197, 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). See also Allstate Ins. Co. v. Boecher, 733 So. 2d 993, 994 (Fla.1999) (noting the lack of "affidavits, depositions or other sworn testimony in the record to support Allstate's

IBAO Jack Scarola, Esq. [email protected]; [email protected] Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Esq. [email protected]; [email protected] Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 3340

each Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Esq. [email protected]; [email protected]

r the circuit courts not to interfere with the jurisdiction of the courts of appeal when issues are then pending before them." Id. at 983. See also Allstate Ins. Co. v. Titusville Total Health Care, 848 So. 2d 1166, 1167 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ("Courts have often held that it is appropriate for one court to stay an

, P.A. Mark Nurik Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik Jack Goldberger Atterburv. Goldberger & Weiss. P.A. -19- EFTA00

. Mark Nurik Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik Jack Goldberger Atterburv. Goldberger & Weiss. P.A. -19- EFTA00

d." Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So. 2d 638, 644 (Fla.1999). "This rule applies in cases of summary judgments as well." Landis v. Allstate Ins. Co., 546 So. 2d 1051, 1053 (Fla. 1989); see also Rivernider, supra (holding that although trial judge erred in granting summary judgment based upon the

day of May, 2011 on Gary M. Farmer, Jr., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, et al, 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; Jack Alan Goldberger, Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S.

e, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; Jack Alan Goldberger, Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Austral

are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in the case in which the discovery is sought. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b)(1); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston, 655 So. 2d 91, 94 (Fla. 1995). 10. "Pretrial discovery was implemented to simplify the issues in a case, to eliminate the element of

nt/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Austral

, 48 So. 3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (probative value outweighed by prejudicial effect when evidence improperly becomes focus of trial); Maldonado v. Allstate Ins. Co., 789 So. 2d 464 (Ha. 2d DCA 2001) (probative value of bicyclist's status as an illegal alien was outweighed by unfair prejudice, confusion of the i

from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 4-6-06 86. Letter from Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney dated 4-10-06 87. Letter from Goldberger dated 6-22-06 88. All subpoenas issued to State Grand Jury 89. Documents related to the rental of a vehicle for 90. Ted's Sheds Documents 91.

, 48 So. 3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (probative value outweighed by prejudicial effect when evidence improperly becomes focus of trial); Maldonado v. Allstate Ins. Co., 789 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (probative value of bicyclist's status as an illegal alien was outweighed by unfair prejudice, confusion of the

Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldbe er Es.. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 14

r the circuit courts not to interfere with the jurisdiction of the courts of appeal when issues are then pending before them." Id. at 983. See also Allstate Ins. Co. v. Titusville Total Health Care, 848 So. 2d 1166, 1167 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ("Courts have often held that it is appropriate for one court to stay an