Epstein Secrets

ween Aug. 1 and Oct. 31 of last year, according to an indictment charging him with one felony count of solicitation of prostitution. His attorney, Jack Goldberger, has said Epstein "would never knowingly break the law." The 53-year-old money manager gave thousands to New Mexico political candidates, includin

d written on myspace.com about smoking marijuana and drinking alcohol. But if the girls have a credibility problem, what about Jeffrey Epstein? Mr. Goldberger, told The Post: "Mr. Epstein absolutely insisted anybody who came to his house be over the age of 18. How he verified that, I don't know." And pros

id (a neighbor), who has become friends with some of Epstein's employees. '... Whatever they do there is their business, so I just let it drop.' " Lamont/Lieberman: So far at least 20 Democratic U.S. senators have said they will back Connecticut Democratic Senate nominee Ned Lamont in the general ele

se of sheer embarrass- ment," he said. "But she very much looked 14. Any prudent man would have had second thoughts about that." Defense attorney Jack Goldberger maintains that not only did Epstein pass a polygraph test showing he did not know the girls were minors, but their stories weren't credible. The

the Palm Beach County Jail early July 23 and released hours later. Epstein's legal team 'doesn't dispute that lie had girls over for massages," Goldberger said. But he said their claims that they had sex- ual encounters with him lack credi- bility. "They arc incapable of being believed' he said, They

ourage "Al-C./atria types." according to The New )irk Times. Al-Qaeda types? They've been closely watching the outcome of the contest between Mr. Lamont and Sen. Lieberman. seeking encouragement? You've got to be kidding. First off, the vast majority of Tex- ans couldn't tell you who won the race

were already pending against lender in bankruptcy adversary proceeding. Fed. Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 23(bX3), 28 U.S.C.A. ARGUED: Daniel P. Shapiro, Goldberg, Kohn, Bell, Black, Rosenbloom & Moritz, Ltd, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellant. Gil- bert Scott Bagnell, Bagnell & Eason, L.L.C., Columbia, South

nt power, whereby the government improperly imposed an aft firmative obligation likely to have a deter- rent effect on the exercise of his rights, Lamont v. Postmaster General, 381 U.S. 301, 308, 85 S.Ct. 1493, 1497, 14 LEd.2d 398 (1965), the requirements of standing are met. Laird, 408 U.S. at 11-1