Epstein Secrets

Suite 350 444 W. Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Fred Haddad Fred Haddad, P.A. 1 Financial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Jack Goldberger 24 EFTA00589644 Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik 1 E. Broward Blvd., Ste. 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 S.

Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Jack Goldberger 24 EFTA00589644 Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik

16 So. 3d 1205 (Fla. 2013) 2, 10, 18, 19 Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007) passim Fridovich v. Fridovich, 598 So. 2d 65 (FIa. 1992) 13, 17, 22 Graham-Eckes Palm Beach Academy v. Johnson, 573 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) 21 Jackson v. Attorney's

ion is reviewable on appeal' and the availability of other remedies through which the trial court could mitigate the harm. . ." Id. at 1215 (citing Fridovich, 598 So. 2d at 69). Accordingly, the DelMonico decision affirmatively recognized a litigation privilege where, as in the instant case, there is jud

njoys the same immunity. We agree." Id. at 427. Appellant's reliance on Fridovich v. Fridovich, 598 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 1992) is also erroneous, as in Fridovich the Florida Supreme Court specifically concluded that only a qualified privilege is applicable when private individuals voluntarily make defamatory

rting.com 888 811-3408 EFTA00606577 69 62:11 forever (2) 16:12,14 forget (1) further (3) 14:19 36:7 38:10 future (1) 46:11 55:17 56:22 GOLDBERG... 2:8,10 hand (1) 36:12 handle (1) 24:24 holds (2) 25:12,16 Honor (27) 3:5 4:20,24 5:25 14:18 39:22 Goldberger's ... handled (3) 6:10,1

[email protected] 7 8 ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, PA 9 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1400 10 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.659.8300 11 BY: JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE [email protected] 12 13 TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7th Street 14 Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 15 954.467.1223 BY: TONJA H

and www.phippsreporting.com 888 811-3408 EFTA00606563 55 1 shouldn't. I ruled in your favor and I've ruled 2 against you. I've ruled in Mr. Goldberger's 3 favor; I've ruled against him. I've ruled in 4 favor of Mr. Edwards' claims and contentions; I've 5 ruled against him. 6 But I'm just hav

n of stalking. And 8 the court distinguished that claim privilege from 9 a defamation case that was addressed in a case 10 called Fridovich vs. Fridovich, 598 Sold. 65, 11 Florida Supreme Court case 1992, in which the 12 Supreme Court was presented with a certified 13 question of whether a person

accusing Olson of stalking. And 8 the court distinguished that claim privilege from 9 a defamation case that was addressed in a case 10 called Fridovich vs. Fridovich, 598 Sold. 65, 11 Florida Supreme Court case 1992, in which the 12 Supreme Court was presented with a certified 13 question of wh

ancial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale FL 33301 Jack Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, M. 250 S. Austra

l Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale FL 33301 Jack Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, M. 250 S. Austra

ion is reviewable on appeal' and the availability of other remedies through which the trial court could mitigate the harm. . ." Id. at 1215 (citing Fridovich, 598 So. 2d at 69). Accordingly, the DelMonico decision affirmatively recognized a litigation privilege where, as in the instant case, there is jud

116 So. 3d 1205 (Fla. 2013) 2, 10, 18, 19 Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barren & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007) passim Fridovich v. Fridovich, 598 So. 2d 65 (FIa. 1992) 13, 17, 22 Graham-Eckes Palm Beach Academy v. Johnson, 573 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) 21 Jackson v. Attorney's

njoys the same immunity. We agree." Id. at 427. Appellant's reliance on Fridovich v. Fridovich, 598 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 1992) is also erroneous, as in Fridovich the Florida Supreme Court specifically concluded that only a qualified privilege is applicable when private individuals voluntarily make defamatory

inancial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale FL 01 Jack Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 S. Aust

ial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale FL 01 Jack Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 S. Aust

d 1054, 1056 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). See also Montejo v. Martin Memorial Medical Center, Inc., 935 So. 2d 1266, 1269 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Fridovich v. Fridovich, 598 So. 2d 65 (Ha. 1992) (stating that the litigation privilege "arises immediately upon the doing of any act required or permitted by law in the

ion is reviewable on appeal' and the availability of other remedies through which the trial court could mitigate the harm. . ." Id. at 1215 (citing Fridovich, 598 So. 2d at 69). Accordingly, the DelMonico decision affirmatively recognized a litigation privilege where, as in the instant case, there is jud

njoys the same immunity. We agree." Id. at 427. Appellant's reliance on Fridovich v. Fridovich, 598 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 1992) is also erroneous, as in Fridovich the Florida Supreme Court specifically concluded that only a qualified privilege is applicable when private individuals voluntarily make defamatory

[email protected] 7 8 ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, PA 9 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1400 10 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.659.8300 11 BY: JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE [email protected] 12 13 TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7th Street 14 Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 15 954.467.1223 BY: TONJA H

w.phippsreporting.com 888 811-3408 001264 EFTA00613561 55 1 shouldn't. I ruled in your favor and I've ruled 2 against you. I've ruled in Mr. Goldberger's 3 favor; I've ruled against him. I've ruled in 4 favor of Mr. Edwards' claims and contentions; I've 5 ruled against him. 6 But I'm just hav

m 888 811-3408 001278 EFTA00613575 69 62:11 forever (2) 16:12,14 forget (1) further (3) 14:19 36:7 38:10 future (1) 46:11 55:17 56:22 GOLDBERG... 2:8,10 hand (1) 36:12 handle (1) 24:24 holds (2) 25:12,16 Honor (27) 3:5 4:20,24 5:25 14:18 39:22 Goldberger's ... handled (3) 6:10,

accusing Olson of stalking. And 8 the court distinguished that claim privilege from 9 a defamation case that was addressed in a case 10 called Fridovich vs. Fridovich, 598 So2d. 65, 11 Florida Supreme Court case 1992, in which the 12 Supreme Court was presented with a certified 13 question of wh

n of stalking. And 8 the court distinguished that claim privilege from 9 a defamation case that was addressed in a case 10 called Fridovich vs. Fridovich, 598 So2d. 65, 11 Florida Supreme Court case 1992, in which the 12 Supreme Court was presented with a certified 13 question of whether a person

day of August 2009: Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #8 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, M. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epste

218 Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #8 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, M. 250 Aust

nding tort" because it "realleges the same facts mentioned in appellant's sexual abuse claims and fails to provide any additional facts." Citing to Fridovich v. Fridovich, 598 So.2d 65, 69-70 (Fla. 1992)(holding that no separate cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress existed wher

012 to: Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. P.O. Drawer 3626 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices

Drawer 3626 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Au

nts made in the course of litigation, are subject to an absolute privilege, and thus, will not support a claim for injury to reputation. See, e.g., Fridovich v. Fridovich, 598 So. 2d 65 (Fla. I 992)(defamatory statements made in the course of judicial proceedings are absolutely privileged). Accordingly, a