Epstein Secrets

GOLDBERGER a WEISS. P.A. e 1400 Iv would be unacceptable, that specific individual 17 lo exhibits needed to be listed. I'n sure your Honor By JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE :5 has a recollection of these circumstances. And 18 29 21 that, obviously, is a fairly standard order that S0 31 your Honor adheres

fling 17 Mr. Link's law flat, the Fowler Mite law firm, I 17 that request on behalf of my clients. is is believe there are several others, Mr. Goldterger's law firm, we want then all co canvass their 1$ 19 We're told that Mr. Goldberger has seen it, we're told Mr. Epstein ha0 seen it. We want to

did not improperly obtain thee, nor were they inadvertently disclosed co us. 4 earlier attempted to exclude the surprise testimony • THE COURT: Tina Campbell is your paralegal? 5 by an unsuccessful notion in limlne. Furthermore, a MS. RCCICENBACH: 4010 obtained the three boxes, 4 prejudice in the con

4 1a disclosed would net be penn/Lted CO be used at. 25 For Jeffrey Epstein: 17 trial. You rude it clear that catchall listings 16 ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER a WEISS, P.A. 1ca would be unacceptable; that specific Individual 17 lo exhibits needed to be listed. I'n sure your Honor By JACK A. GOLDBERGER

ERBURY, GOLDBERGER a WEISS, P.A. 1ca would be unacceptable; that specific Individual 17 lo exhibits needed to be listed. I'n sure your Honor By JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE 25 has a recollection of these circumstances. And 10 29 21 that, obviously, is a fairly standard order that S0 31 your Honor adhere

did not improperly obtain thee, nor were they inadvertently disclosed co us. 4 earlier attempted to exclude the surprise testimony • THE COURT: Tina Campbell is your paralegal? 5 by an unsuccessful notion in limlne. Furthermore, a MS. RCCICENBACH: 4010 obtained the three boxes, 4 prejudice in the con

ke? Rockenbach: Objection. Work product, attorney-client, and beyond the scope of Judge Ray's order. Please do not answer. Q. Same question as to Jack Goldberger. Rockenbach: Same objection. Same instruction. (Link 62:14-6:7.) EFTA00794263 Again, this line of questioning as to whom Mr. Link spoke with con

ease do not answer. Q. Same question as to Jack Goldberger. Rockenbach: Same objection. Same instruction.

25:8-26:15). Mr. Link was also asked a long line of questions about his firm's review of the disc after its discovery: Q. How did she [Paralegal Tina Campbell] review the disc contents? Rockenbach (counsel for Mr. Link): I am going to object on the basis of, not only work product protection, but that thi

SSELL, ESQUIRE 5 For Jeffrey Epstein: 4 ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER 4 WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE 1 2 3 S 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 la 19 20 it 22 22 24 25 exhibit list filed by Mr. Epstein on November 16. 2017. T

nt. My law : . . . • documents, the appellate court will have the opportunity to do that. is 25 and My client. And 1 tan say legal counsel, Mr. Goldberger. So that's it. THE COURT: So you're suggesting to file with :a MR. SCAROLA: that nay require 40114 further • the Clerk or Court under seal the d

inadvertently disclo.. And it aaya, quote, 'The opposing party also a to us. i earlier attempted to exclude the surprise testimony 4 THE CURT: Tina Campbell is your paralegal' • by an unsuccessful notion in limlne. Furthernare, 5 /12. ROCWITEACH: Who obtained the three boxes. prejudice in the context