Epstein Secrets

[email protected] 7 8 ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, PA 9 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1400 10 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.659.8300 11 BY: JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE [email protected] 12 13 TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7th Street 14 Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 15 954.467.1223 BY: TONJA H

w.phippsreporting.com 888 811-3408 001264 EFTA00613561 55 1 shouldn't. I ruled in your favor and I've ruled 2 against you. I've ruled in Mr. Goldberger's 3 favor; I've ruled against him. I've ruled in 4 favor of Mr. Edwards' claims and contentions; I've 5 ruled against him. 6 But I'm just hav

m 888 811-3408 001278 EFTA00613575 69 62:11 forever (2) 16:12,14 forget (1) further (3) 14:19 36:7 38:10 future (1) 46:11 55:17 56:22 GOLDBERG... 2:8,10 hand (1) 36:12 handle (1) 24:24 holds (2) 25:12,16 Honor (27) 3:5 4:20,24 5:25 14:18 39:22 Goldberger's ... handled (3) 6:10,

ecution, and that Wolfe is in conflict with pre-existing law on this issue. See 5 EFTA00613594 Brief, p. 6. Appellant does, however, concede that Summary Judgment was proper as to his Abuse of Process claim, see Brief, p. 10, n.2, and that there are no disputed issues of fact presented. Brief, p. 10. Appelle

Suite 350 444 W. Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Fred Haddad Fred Haddad, P.A. 1 Financial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Jack Goldberger 24 EFTA00589644 Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik 1 E. Broward Blvd., Ste. 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 S.

Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Jack Goldberger 24 EFTA00589644 Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik

ecution, and that Wolfe is in conflict with pre-existing law on this issue. See 5 EFTA00589625 Brief, p. 6. Appellant does, however, concede that Summary Judgment was proper as to his Abuse of Process claim, see Brief, p. 10, n.2, and that there are no disputed issues of fact presented. Brief, p. 10. Appelle

ancial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale FL 33301 Jack Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, M. 250 S. Austra

l Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale FL 33301 Jack Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, M. 250 S. Austra

ecution, and that Wolfe is in conflict with pre-existing law on this issue. See 5 EFTA00714928 Brief, p. 6. Appellant does, however, concede that Summary Judgment was proper as to his Abuse of Process claim, see Brief, p. 10, n.2, and that there are no disputed issues of fact presented. Brief, p. 10. Appelle

inancial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale FL 01 Jack Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 S. Aust

ial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale FL 01 Jack Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 S. Aust

based on the undeniable holdings in Wolfe and the cases cited therein, Epstein's actions were absolutely protected by the litigation privilege and Summary Judgment was properly granted. Additionally, Appellant attempts to support his position by referencing the most recent Florida Supreme Court decision apply