Epstein Secrets

7 684:11 776:22 www.phippsreporting.com (888)811-3408 EFTA00602493 21 sent (3) 677:10 771:21 774:2 SHIPLEY (1) 649:4 shocked (3) 747:15 Simpson (38) 649:19 652:15 small (10) 675:12,14,19 676:8,13,18 650:13 652:24 652:25 653:13 653:17 655:25 sentence (2) 751:15,23 652:16 653:1 678:8

708:23 710:9 743:6,12,15 significant (1) 721:12 speak (4) 713:21 716:14 shared (2) 763:22 six (1) 716:9 755:24 717:12 718:3 668:13 698:13 Sigrid (7) 665:3 767:18,25 719:3,13,18 shares (1) 650:9 652:19 skeptical (1) speaking (5) 722:7,14 760:13 724:13,14 714:18 742:21 752:24 723:12

and Thomas 15 Marcy Martinez. Videographer 16 17 Scott will be joining. He just walked in. 17 18 MS. McCAWLEY: On behalf of nonparty 18 19 Sigrid McCawley and my 19 20 colleague Meredith Schultz from Boles. Schiller 20 21 & Plexner. 21 22 22 MR. INDYKE: On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. 23 23 D

use to answer." Others have 25 non-parties are net permitted to attend. per 722 724 1 done that. I was totally. totally innocent. And I 1 Ms. McCawley's position that its between those 2 had to respond immediately to these false charges. 2 folks if they disagree about that. But as to 3 which is

rg To: "jeffrey E." [email protected]> Cc: Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:47:23 +0000 Yes re Simpson MTQ unlikely to totally stop deposition - more to limit it, perhaps protective order re video dissemination I could discuss venue, time if we want

negotiate date, place otherwise they could serve you in fla or vi Yes, risk of transfer to ny from boston but i can blame my own packed schedule if Sigrid agrees to boston which is unlikely Sent from my iPhone On Apr 7, 2016, at 6:06 AM, "jeffrey E." leevacation®gmail.com> wrote: > cant use that as

drews Avenue, Suite 2, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301; [email protected], to: Paul G. Cassell, Esq.,; [email protected], [email protected], to: Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq., Boies Schiller & Flexner, LLP, 401 E. Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1200, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301, this 3rd day of February, 2016. By: s/Ihomas E.

_OVERSIGHT_015612 --- PAGE BREAK --- EXHIBIT B HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015613 --- PAGE BREAK --- From: Susan Moss To: Thomas E. Scott; Steven R. Safra; Simpson, Richard; Borja, Mary; Eiler, Ashley; Jack Scarola; Mary E. Pirrotta; [email protected] Subject: Edward & Cassell v. Dershowitz CACE 15-000072 (0

Virginia Roberts, which she swore to under oath, is so outrageous, so preposterous, that even David Boies said he couldn’t believe it was true. MS. McCAWLEY: I object. I object. I'm not going to allow you to reveal any conversations that happened in the context of a settlement discussion. THE WITNESS: Do