Epstein Secrets

ott Goldstein Address unknown at this time 58. Alfredo Rodriguez Address unknown at this time 59. Earleen Cote

stein Address unknown at this time 58. Alfredo Rodriguez Address unknown at this time 59. Earleen Cote

time 53. Frank Preve Banyon Funding, LLC 2455 E. Sunrise Blvd., Penthouse Suite 54. Kendall Coffey Coffey Burlington PL 2699 S. Bayshore Dr., Penthouse Miami, FL 33133-5408 55. Seth Lehrman Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-326

ney was paid to each of aw nam &@ WN NNNNN NF BBR PP HP HR PH vB Wd FP OO ON THM WN HF OW A. Alberto Rodriguez -- Q. No, sir, Alfredo Rodriguez. A. Alfredo Rodriguez, I never knew him by name. He was, of course, there out -- well outside of the timeframe of the alleged events in this case. And so anything that he

have a basis for believing that I may have played a role as Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer in seeking to do harm to him. But again, there’s nothing in Mr. Rodriguez's testimony which is in any way inculpatory of me. I think he has me sitting and -- and reading a book and drinking a glass of wine. . In the presen

a young woman. MR. SCOTT: Objection. You're cutting the witness off. You're not letting him finish. A. This looks like a picture out of a Playboy or Penthouse magazine. It does not look to me like a person who is under the age of 16 or 17 or 18. But I don't think you can tell anything from the picture. I th

dly discrimi- nates against a large, diverse, and amor- phous class, unified only by the common factor" of language. San Antonio School District v. Rodrigues, 411 U.S. 1, 28, 93 S.Ct. 1278, 1293, 36 L.Ed.2d 16 (1973). We agree that within a society "of multitudi- nous origins, customs, tongues, beliefs,

ct Court for the Northern District of Georgia Before TJOFLAT and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges, and LYNNE', District Judge. TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: Penthouse brought this suit to enjoin the Solicitor General of Fulton County, Geor- gia, Hinson McAuliffe, from prosecuting or threatening to prosecute under

attorneys against him in Broward County Circuit Court for defamation of them. Moreover, the law cited by Prof. Dershowitz, including the Sackman and Penthouse cases, demonstrates a need and entitlement to intervene to vindicate his legitimate reputational interest that no other party is situated to protect.

er. Instead, the deposition testimony which Jane Doe #3 points to simply states that Prof. Dershowitz visited Epstein’s home (Deposition Testimony of Alfredo Rodriguez at 199, 278, 279, DE 291-18, herein, “Rodriguez Depo. Tr.”) Rodriguez specifically testified that he has no idea whether Prof. Dershowitz had any co

points to simply states that Prof. Dershowitz visited Epstein’s home (Deposition Testimony of Alfredo Rodriguez at 199, 278, 279, DE 291-18, herein, “Rodriguez Depo. Tr.”) Rodriguez specifically testified that he has no idea whether Prof. Dershowitz had any contact at all with any female. T2 HOUSE_OVERSIG