Epstein Secrets

*************** N A R R A T I V E # 28 ************************** NA Reported By: Entered By.: On December 20. 2005 12/21/05 12/21/05 riguez. Rodriguez, who rest es in Miami, a e u e t e process servers previously and was not served the investigative subpoena. A telephone message was left as she i

sent to the respective or I received a telephone call from State Attorney's Office, who informed me that the former houseman for Jeffrey Epstein, Alfredo Rodriguez, was present at the State Attorney's Office for an interview. Rodri ez was issued an investi ative sub oena I respon e to t e State Attorney's O

ed By.: # 4 *************************** 9/26/05 9/26/05 On 3-24-05 at 11:00 pm, a copy of tape 2 (case number 05-294) had been made for Det. by Evidence S ecialist The copy was turned over to Detective On Friday, 09-23-05 at approimately 2:15 pm, I was in the process of reproducing audio tapes (micr

ng her that she could keep the car for an extra month. did not provide any additional information. On November 10, 2005, at approximately 9:47 am, Alfredo Rodriguez had telephoned reference my business card found on his door. Rodriguez stated he had worked with Epstein for approximately six months after EFTA01

EACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Page: 51 Time: 9:27:55 Incident Report Program: CMS301L Case No • 1-05-000368 (Continued) the previous houseman left. Rodriguez stated that it was his responsibility to keep the identity of the masseuses private. Mr. Epstein had a massage in the morning and one in the aftern

********* NA Reported By: Entered By.: 9/26/05 9/26/05 On 3-24-05 at 11:00 pm, a copy of tape 2 (case number 05-294) had been made for Det by Evidence S ecialis IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII . The copy was turned oM illiDetective On Friday, 09-23-05 at approimately 2:15 pm, I was in the process of reproducing a

een what, 19? A: Uh-huh. Q: Alright. So July, August you would have been 19, 20 On the verge of 20? A: Uh-huh. (Sworn Statement of 11/4/05). • Alfredo Rodriquez: Q: Okay. Did they appear young to you? A: Yes. They were young. You know, that I never seen anybody older than 28 or something like that. Q: Any

sistants, his girlfriend, and her friends, all of whom are indisputably over the age of 18, with the women at issue here. More to the point, even if Rodriquez did so claim, the flight records and the statements of the pilots show conclusively that none of these women ever traveled in interstate commerce o

By.: # 4 ********************* ***** * 9/26/05 9/26/05 On 3-24-05 at 11:00 pm, a copy of tape 2 (case number 05-294) had been made for Det. by Evidence S ecialist . The copy was turned over to Detective . On Friday, 09-23-05 at approimately 2:15 pm, I was in the process of reproducing audio tapes