Epstein Secrets

exacting first Amendment scrutiny." Id. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, M.D., 734 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1

on of discovered information before trial is not the kind of classic prior restraint that requires exacting first Amendment scrutiny." Id. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, M.D., 734 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(any order restraining press access must consider less restrictive alternatives including, but not limited

statements can and should be prohibited. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, 734 So. 2d 1162, 1164-65 (Fla. 3d

991). 16. The foregoing authorities make perfectly clear that in appropriate cases extrajudicial statements can and should be prohibited. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, 734 So. 2d 1162, 1164-65 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (proper for a court to determine on a case-by-case basis whether good cause is shown to impose limitat

statements can and should be prohibited. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, 734 So. 2d 1162, 1164-65 (Fla. 3d

991). 16. The foregoing authorities make perfectly clear that in appropriate cases extrajudicial statements can and should be prohibited. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, 734 So. 2d 1162, 1164-65 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (proper for a court to determine on a case-by-case basis whether good cause is shown to impose limitat