Epstein Secrets

prosecution case. 4. Video of Jeffrey Epstein's home and route from victim to Epstein's home 9. Documents related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by Alfredo Rodriguez 11. Jeffrey Epstein phone records 12. phone records 15. All probable cause affidavits related to criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein 16. Al

ts related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by Alfredo Rodriguez 11. Jeffrey Epstein phone records 12. phone r

review and evaluate same prior to trial; causing unfair prejudice. Escutia v. Greenleaf Products, Inc., 886 So. 2d 1059, 1062 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Agrofollajes, S.A. v. E.I. DU Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc., Nos. 3D07- 2322, 3D07-2318, 3D07-1036, 2009 WL 4828975, at *16 (Fla. 3d DCA Dec. 16, 2009) (stating "F

ts related to Jeffrey Epstein produced by Alfredo Rodriguez. 24. Jeffrey Epstein flight logs. This is so ov

ttlement Agreements between Epstein and victims of his sexual molestations. 145. Phone journal taken from Epstein's home and produced to the FBI by Alfredo Rodriguez. 146. Photo depicting Ghislaine Maxwell, and Prince Andrew. 147. Al flight logs for any Epstein owned or controlled aircraft. This is so overbro

should be excluded." City of Miami v. Calandro, 376 So. 2d 271, 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (citing Perper v. Edell, 44 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1949)). See also Agrofollajes, S.A. v. E. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc., 48 So. 3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (probative value outweighed by prejudicial effect when evidence improp

deal with those issues independently. I think it's worth some time to be taken. Phone journal taken from Epstein's home and produced to the FBI by Rodriguez. That's the houseman. Same ruling as I made earlier with regard to that. Photograph depicting Roberts, Maxwell and Prince Andrew. MS. ROCKENBACH

should be excluded." City of Miami v. Calandro, 376 So. 2d 271, 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (citing Perper v. Edell, 44 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1949)). See also Agrofollajes, S.A. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. Inc., 48 So. 3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (probative value outweighed by prejudicial effect when evidence improp