Epstein Secrets

viduals. Mr. Scarola agreed. Id. at 203, 0 4-16. 13 Epstein's counsel proceeded to other areas of inquiry. He asked if Edwards had ever spoken to Alfredo Rodriguez during the hiatus between the deposition sessions with Rodriguez. A claim of work product privilege was made. Id. At 205-206. Edwards refused to 10

roceeded to other areas of inquiry. He asked if Edwards had ever spoken to Alfredo Rodriguez during the hiatus between the deposition sessions with Rodriguez. A claim of work product privilege was made. Id. At 205-206. Edwards refused to 10 EFTA00606635 answer any questions about his communications wit

334011 (561) 802-9044 EFTA00606625 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.120 I Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M

REDIRECT 6 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE 7 BY MR. CRITTON 5 8 9 10 11 EXHIBITS 12 13 14 EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION PAGE 15 PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ 211 16 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT PLAINTIFF'S EX. 2 COMPLAINT 239 17 PLAINTIFF'S EX. 3 JULY 22, 2009 276 FACSMILE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 P

DESCRIPTION PAGE 15 PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ 211 16 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT PLAINTIFF'S EX. 2 C

Page 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, -vs- VOLUME I OF II SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and III.

ANN M Cm f •Debi edema ono IF• coda loot mama RODRIGUEZ 11 • Nanquntlbee Nano en Sec lieifg/.38 tnebvat

00 c Ernmayar's name, addrere, and ZIP Dodo FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY, INC. d Employee's social sonority number Ewan 'Hann nem end WU Lea R name ODRIGUEZ f fi e'e address and ZIP tad "F Sun. Soots, security Trg $3.3 € 4 Sedal security tFotr088.,,,, 4 6 median wspayroa 689.36 0 Advance Fle etnen

Member Dershowitz Ei er & Adelson, P.C. NM= ew York Co. Telephone: Fax: Email: e mail AY Peer Review Rated Practice Areas: Criminal Appeals; Complex Litigation; Civil Litigation; Post-Conviction Remedies Admitted: 1966, New York Law School: New York University, LL.B., 1966 College: Brooklyn College of th

statements can and should be prohibited. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, 734 So. 2d 1162, 1164-65 (Fla. 3d

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and

statements can and should be prohibited. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, 734 So. 2d 1162, 1164-65 (Fla. 3d

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,