Epstein Secrets

o Rodriguez. Responses due by 12/18/2009 (tmn) (Entered: 12/09/2009) 12/01/2009 2 SEALED ORDER granting I Motion to Seal Criminal Complaint as to Alfredo Rodriguez (1). Signed by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson on 12/1/2009. (tmn) (Entered: 12/09/2009) 12/01/2009 a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT as to Alfredo Rodrigu

in a pending civil case before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, he came into contact with Alfredo Rodriguez ("Rodriguez"), who was a subpoenaed witness in the civil case. 4. Rodriguez had been interviewed by FBI agents on January 18, 2007, in connection with a fede

/09/2009) 12/09/2009 7 $50,000 PSB Entered as to Alfredo Rodriguez. Approved by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson. Special Conditions: Report to Pretrial Services 1X per month in person and 1X per month by telephone:None of the signatories may sell, pledge, mortgage, etc., any property they own, real or perso

o Rodriguez. Responses due by 12/18/2009 (tmn) (Entered: 12/09/2009) 12/01/2009 2 SEALED ORDER granting I Motion to Seal Criminal Complaint as to Alfredo Rodriguez (1). Signed by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson on 12/1/2009. (tmn) (Entered: 12/09/2009) 12/01/2009 a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT as to Alfredo Rodrigu

in a pending civil case before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, he came into contact with Alfredo Rodriguez ("Rodriguez"), who was a subpoenaed witness in the civil case. 4. Rodriguez had been interviewed by FBI agents on January 18, 2007, in connection with a fede

/09/2009) 12/09/2009 7 $50,000 PSB Entered as to Alfredo Rodriguez. Approved by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson. Special Conditions: Report to Pretrial Services 1X per month in person and 1X per month by telephone:None of the signatories may sell, pledge, mortgage, etc., any property they own, real or perso

tates v. English, 629 F.3d 311, 319 (2d Cir. 2011) (quoting United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001)); see also United States v. Rodriguez, 950 F.2d 85, 88 (2d Cir. 1991) ("[A] defendant must introduce some evidence contrary to the presumed fact in order to rebut the presumption."). No

he Court emphasized in its denial of the second motion for release on bail, the discrepancies between the information presented to the Court and to Pretrial Services in July 2020 and the information presented to the Court in December 2020 raised significant concerns about candor. See Dec. Op. at 16. There remain

son", United States Xidam , 84 F.3d 441, 442 (D.C. Cir. 1996)(per curiam , and "the safety of any other person and the community." United States I Rodriguez. 897 F. Supp. 1461, 1463 (S.D. Fla. 1995); IS U.S.C. § 3142(c). Cases Which Qualify For Detention Hearings: Section 3142(f) defines specific situa

vices Agency in every judicial district and pre scribing duties); E.D. Mich. Local Crim. R. 5.1(b), 10.1(b). This recommendation is the result of a Pretrial Services Officer's (1) interview of the defendant, (2) receipt of information from the government and defense counsel, and (3) i ndependent (though brief an

tates v. English, 629 F.3d 311, 319 (2d Cir. 2011) (quoting United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001)); see also United States v. Rodriguez, 950 F.2d 85, 88 (2d Cir. 1991) ("[A] defendant must introduce some evidence contrary to the presumed fact in order to rebut the presumption."). Non

d be limited to appearances in Court, meetings with 5 EFTA00013311 --- PAGE BREAK --- counsel, medical visits, and upon approval by the Court or Pretrial Services. Id. at 2-3. Furthermore, the Defendant would have on-premises security guards that she would pay for who would prevent her from leaving the reside

tates v. English, 629 F.3d 311, 319 (2d Cir. 2011) (quoting United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001)); see also United States v. Rodriguez, 950 F.2d 85, 88 (2d Cir. 1991) ("[A] defendant must introduce some evidence contrary to the presumed fact in order to rebut the presumption."). No

he Court emphasized in its denial of the second motion for release on bail, the discrepancies between the information presented to the Court and to Pretrial Services in July 2020 and the information presented to the Court in December 2020 raised significant concerns about candor. See Dec. Op. at 16. There remain