Epstein Secrets

enage girls1 an attorney representing seven of the victims said Friday. New details about the contents of the journal were released this week when Alfredo Rodriguez1 who worked as a property manager for the Palm Beach resident, pleaded guilty to obstruction of justice for lying to federal agents when asked if h

pecific list of victims that the U.S. Attorney's Office knew about when it penned the deal in 2007. If additional victims are listed in the journal Rodriguez stole, Horowitz said federal prosecutors could reopen the investigation. "It opens the door for further prosecution," he said. In addition to turn

she wanted a sealed copy of the agreement filed in his case, and Goldberger concurred that he wanted it sealed. Belohlavek later signed off on it. The Florida Supreme Court has expressed "serious concern" and launched an all-out inquiry into sealing procedures across the state following media reports in 2006 of entire

viduals. Mr. Scarola agreed. Id. at 203, 0 4-16. 13 Epstein's counsel proceeded to other areas of inquiry. He asked if Edwards had ever spoken to Alfredo Rodriguez during the hiatus between the deposition sessions with Rodriguez. A claim of work product privilege was made. Id. At 205-206. Edwards refused to 10

roceeded to other areas of inquiry. He asked if Edwards had ever spoken to Alfredo Rodriguez during the hiatus between the deposition sessions with Rodriguez. A claim of work product privilege was made. Id. At 205-206. Edwards refused to 10 EFTA00606635 answer any questions about his communications wit

ranscript at 50, 54, 91, 100-104, 114, 126,-127, 155, 170, 181, 184-187, 192, 198-202, 205-206, 208-210, 212, 215-217; Exhibit 1. Forty years ago, the Florida Supreme Court, in Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d 108, 112 (Fla. 1970), gave this general definition of work product saying what it is and what it is no

iles?" "Same objection." Judge, you can go through again, that goes to -- Mr. Scarola objects to every question asked. Then the subject turns to Alfredo Rodriguez. Mr. Epstein's attorney attempted to ask on two separate dates about Mr. Rodriquez in the deposition. And again, the first question, Judge -- you

ts to every question asked. Then the subject turns to Alfredo Rodriguez. Mr. Epstein's attorney attempted to ask on two separate dates about Mr. Rodriquez in the deposition. And again, the first question, Judge -- you can look at he dates and see how germane these issues Palm Beach Reporting Service,

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 -- the case had basically not been actively prosecuted in this court until June 2017 when the Florida Supreme Court issued its final ruling. So should the Court grant our motion, we did preserve the right to redepose Mr. Edwards on these issues. We feel not onl

exacting first Amendment scrutiny." Id. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, M.D., 734 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1

es expressly addressed to the trial court's exercise of discretion. See Event Services America, Inc. v. Ragusa 917 So.2d 882 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). As the Florida Supreme Court later explained, Icilearly, a trial judge has the inherent power to do those things necessary to enforce its orders, to conduct its business in a p