Epstein Secrets

ant. Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & Rodriguez, 171 F.3d 779, 784 (24 Cir.1999). Because these

Federal Plaintiffs al- lege is not entitled to immunity under the FSIA. In support of this argument, the Federal Plaintiffs cite Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson, 538 U.S. 468, 480, 123 S.Ct. 1655, 155 L.Ed2d 643 (2003), in which the Supreme Court held that instrumentality status is determined at the time o

n New York City, March 15, 2005. (Joe Shildhorn / Patrick McMullen) Jeffrey Epstein, photographed with Adr

ho'd been molested 4 on El Brillo Way. Recarey i i ey interviewed one of Epstein’s pilots, a man named avid Rogers, as well as Epstein’s houseman, Alfredo Rodriguez " Healso s : poke to a woman who really was a massage therapist It i turned out that Epstein paid just one hundred dollars for "act = Swedish es p

Rodriguez did not know was that the associate in question was an undercover employee (UCE) of the FBI. A few days later, on November 2, the UCE calls Rodri- guez and sets up a meeting, which takes place the following day. “During the meeting, Rodriguez produced a small bound book and several sheets of legal p

the Federal Plaintiffs al- lege is not entitled to immunity under the FSIA. In support of this argument, the Federal Plaintiffs cite Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson, 538 U.S. 468, 480, 123 S.Ct. 1655, 155 L.Ed.2d 643 (2003), in which the Supreme Court held that instrumentality status is determined at the time of

dant. Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & Rodriguez, 171 F.3d 779, 784 (2d Cir.1999). Because these m