Epstein Secrets

e. Additionally, he stated the bed would almost always have to be made after the massage. On January 4 2006 I interviewed another former houseman, Mr Alfredo Rodriguez. During a sworn taped statement, Mr. Rodriguez stated he was employed by Jeffrey Epstein for fr°” November 2004 through May of 2005. His responsibili

have to be made after the massage. On January 4 2006 I interviewed another former houseman, Mr Alfredo Rodriguez. During a sworn taped statement, Mr. Rodriguez stated he was employed by Jeffrey Epstein for fr°” November 2004 through May of 2005. His responsibilities as house manager included being the butler

roses to, so that she could drive her self to Epstein's house without incident. Rodriguez said the girl always needed rides to and from the house. Rodiiguez produced a green folder which contained documents, and a note with Mr. Epstein's stationary with direction to deliver a bucket of roses to •·•••••··

, the possibility of a severe sentence is a significant factor in assessing the risk of flight. See Jackson, 823 F.2d at 7; see also United States v. Cisneros, 328 F.3d 610, 618 (10th Cir. 2003) (defendant was a flight risk because her knowledge of the seriousness ofthe charges against her gave her a strong

tates v. English, 629 F.3d 311, 319 (2d Cir. 2011) (quoting United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001)); see also United States v. Rodriguez, 950 F.2d 85, 88 (2d Cir. 1991) ("[A] defendant must introduce some evidence contrary to the presumed fact in order to rebut the presumption."). No

t risk by a preponderance of the evidence and dangerousness to any other person or the community by clear and convincing evidence. United States v. Cisneros, 328 F.3d 610, 616 (10th Cir. 2003). A district court's review of a Magistrate Judge's order of detention is de novo. See Cisneros, 328 F.3d at 616

son", United States Xidam , 84 F.3d 441, 442 (D.C. Cir. 1996)(per curiam , and "the safety of any other person and the community." United States I Rodriguez. 897 F. Supp. 1461, 1463 (S.D. Fla. 1995); IS U.S.C. § 3142(c). Cases Which Qualify For Detention Hearings: Section 3142(f) defines specific situa

y a preponderance of the evidence that no conditions of release will assur the defendant's appearance in court as required. See, r., United States Cisneros, 328 F.3d 610, 616 (10th r. i 2003); United States Xulam, 84 F.3d 441, 442 (D.C. Cir. 1996); Ur(1ed States Kirk, 992 F.2d 1218 (6th Cir.1993)(u