Epstein Secrets

dant. Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & Rodriguez, 171 F.3d 779, 784 (2d Cir.1999). Because these m

rocess requirements. Plaintiffs claim these requirements are met because De- fendants purposefully directed their activi- ties at the United States. Burger King v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 472, 479, 105 8.Ct. 2174, 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985) (explain- ing jurisdiction is appropriate if defendant “purposefully dire

Law Firms *345 Andrew J. Maloney, II, Blanca I. Rodriguez, Brian J. Alexander, *546 David Beekman, David C.

ed States. The minimum contacts requirement is satisfied “if the defendant has ‘purposefully directed’ his activities at the residents of the forum.” Burger King v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 474, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985). Foreseeability is not enough, there must be “some act by which the defendant

ant messenger: Thoughts First Waking Up: Your Best Physical Feature: Your Bedtime: Your Most Missed Memory: Pepsi or Coke: MacDonalds or Burger King: Single or Group Dates: Lipton Ice. Tea or Nestea: Chocolate or Vanilla: Cappuccino or Coffee: Do you Smoke: Do you Swear: Do you Sing: D

IMII 12/10/04 JEFFREY E EPSTEIN GHISLAINE MAXWELL HOUSEHOLD ACCOUNT DDA STATEMENT HISTORY 10.02.11 PAGE 1 OR ACCOUNT 000-000-0000-__ -— OR ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ DATE LAST STATEMENT 11/23/04 DATE THIS STATEMENT 12/10/04 *****DDA TRANSACTIONS***** BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 CHECKS/OTHER DEBITS DEPOSITS/