Epstein Secrets

0 am YOU ARE ALSO COMMANDED to bring with you the following document(s) or object(s): ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS OR INFORMATION RELATING OR REFERRING TO ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, AND/OR ALEXANDRA ("ALEX') HALL. Please coordinate your compliance of this subpoena and confirm the date and time of your appeara

OR INFORMATION RELATING OR REFERRING TO ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, AND/OR ALEXANDRA ("ALEX') HALL

ematis Street West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Grand Jury 07-103(WPB), Disclosure of Grand Jury Material In Re: Operation Leap Year Dear Judge Middlebrooks: This office wishes to report to the court, consistent with Fed. It. Crim. P. 6(e)(3)(B), the disclosure to government personnel of grand jury mate

exacting first Amendment scrutiny." Id. See also Rodriguez v. Feinstein, M.D., 734 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1

force its orders, to conduct its business in a proper manner, and to protect the court from acts obstructing the administration of justice." Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Maves & Mitchell, P.A. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 639 So.2d 606, 608-09 (Fla. 1994). Most recently, the Supreme Court in Bitterman v.

it E; Deposition of E.W., Deposition Attachment #4. 8 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013326 --- PAGE BREAK --- 15. One of Mr. Epstein’s household employees, Mr. Alfredo Rodriguez, saw numerous underage girls coming into Epstein’s mansion for purported “massages.” See Rodriguez Depo. at 242-44 (Deposition Attachment #8). Rodrig

riguez, saw numerous underage girls coming into Epstein’s mansion for purported “massages.” See Rodriguez Depo. at 242-44 (Deposition Attachment #8). Rodriguez was aware that “sex toys” and vibrators were found in Epstein’s bedroom after the purported massages. Jd. at 223-28. Rodriguez thought what Epstein w

ttachment #17); See deposition of Epstein's pilot Larry Eugene Morrison, October 6, 2009, page 102-103 (Deposition Attachment #18); See deposition of Alfredo Rodriguez, August 7, 2009, page 302-306 and 348 (Deposition Attachment #8); See also Prince Andrew's Friend, Ghislaine Maxwell, Some Underage Girls an

or other tortious behavior, suéh as tortious interference with business relationship, so long as act has some relationship to proceeding, See Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So, 2d 606 (Fla. 1994). The immunity afforded to statements made during the course