Epstein Secrets

r filing. 6 But there are statements that are attributed to my 7 client in other articles and things. For example, there are 8 statements about Bill Clinton being on the island, and the 9 defense wants to bring in those statements to show that -- they 10 believe they can show evidence that he wasn't o

, as well. 19 So in our view, it's highly prejudicial under 403. 20 Those groupings should not come in. It should not be about, 21 for example, Clinton and whether or not he was on an island, or 22 Mr. Dershowitz or these other world leaders, it should be about 23 the defendant and her statements

hat she didn't have the 7 opportunity to depose President Clinton. Your Honor, 8 plaintiff's counsel sought to de

handling that. 5 This is essentially a hearsay exercise. We want information to 6 be excluded regarding Rebecca Boylan. Why? Because Rebecca 7 Boylan has not been deposed and is not going to be a witness in 8 the case. 9 As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, 10 she's planning

s of her press complaint in the UK. Likewise, on the next page, your Honor, GM009, at the bottom, again, she specifically refutes the claims about Bill Clinton being on the island and says, "He was never there." Right after that, she says, " discussed that Al Gore and his wife Tipper were also guests on t

to my client, as well. So in our view, it's highly prejudicial under 403. Those groupings should not come in. It should not be about, for example, Clinton and whether or not he was on an island, or Mr. Dershowitz or these other world leaders, it should be about the defendant and her statements that my

s that she didn't have the opportunity to depose President Clinton. Your Honor, plaintiff's counsel sought to depos

handling that. 5 This is essentially a hearsay exercise. We want information to 6 be excluded regarding Rebecca Boylan. Why? Because Rebecca 7 Boylan has not been deposed and is not going to be a witness in 8 the case. 9 As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, 10 she's planning

d with, and that is motion in limine 2, which is Bill. Clinton being on the island. Ms. Maxwell is going to tes

to my client, as well. So in our view, it's highly prejudicial under 403. Those groupings should not come in. It should not be about, for example, Clinton and whether or not he was on an island, or Mr. Dershowitz or these other world leaders, it should be about the defendant and her statements that my

s that she didn't have the opportunity to depose President Clinton. Your Honor, plaintiff's counsel sought to depos

tness in the case. As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, she's planning to call Mr. Dershowitz. Mr. Dershowitz is going to say Ms. Boylan told him that Ms. Giuffre told him something, and so we have the classic hearsay within a hearsay situation. The problem, of course, is that Boylan

ign presidents, and world leaders are highly relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 1) .0...... ce ceeeeseeeseeeseeeseeeseeeneeesees 6 2. Meeting Bill Clinton at Jeffrey Epstein’s private island twice (Motion in Limine 2)..... 8 3. FOIA responses and related materials are admissible (Motion in Limine 3)....

eeseeeseeeseeeseeeseeeneeesees 6 2. Meeting Bill Clinton at Jeffrey Epstein’s private island twice (Motion

g is relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 19)... eee 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s conversation with Rebecca Boylan is admissible (Motion 1n Limine 20)... ceececesessseeseeceeeeseeneeceseeseeneeeeeerseeeaees 31 C. Plaintiff's Remaining Motions In Limine Are Prematu

, foreign presidents, and world leaders are highly relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 1) ..00...0.. eee eceeeeeeeeeeeeeeteeneene 6 2. Meeting Bill Clinton at Jeffrey Epstein’s private island twice (Motion in Limine 2)..... 8 FOIA responses and related materials are admissible (Motion in Limine 3)......

. eee eceeeeeeeeeeeeeeteeneene 6 2. Meeting Bill Clinton at Jeffrey Epstein’s private island twice (Motion

nt and admissible (Motion in Limine 19).................00. 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s conversation with Rebecca Boylan is admissible (Motion in Limine 20)... ccccccccccceceeceeeceseeesecneesseesteeesaeenes 31 C. Plaintiff's Remaining Motions In Limine Are Premature an