Epstein Secrets

3 can be refuted with objective evidence that is readily obtainable by ABC. For example, she claims she was in the presence of both former President Clinton (after January 20, 2001, and before the summer of 2002) and former Vice President Gore (and his wife) at Mr. Epstein's Virgin Island home. I have bee

she claims she was in the presence of both former President Clinton (after January 20, 2001, and before the summer of

ressured into including Professor Dershowitz in her allegations and that she has a financial motive in making these allegations. The Duke of York and the Royal Palace have likewise unequivocally denied Jane Doe's similar allegations against the Duke. Surely, these unequivocal statements of denial of respected membe

3 can be refuted with objective evidence that is readily obtainable by ABC. For example, she claims she was in the presence of both former President Clinton (after January 20, 2001, and before the summer of 2002) and former Vice President Gore (and his wife) at Mr. Epstein's Virgin Island home. I have bee

she claims she was in the presence of both former President Clinton (after January 20, 2001, and before the summer of

ressured into including Professor Dershowitz in her allegations and that she has a financial motive in making these allegations. The Duke of York and the Royal Palace have likewise unequivocally denied Jane Doe's similar allegations against the Duke. Surely, these unequivocal statements of denial of respected membe

can be refuted with objective evidence that is readily obtainable by ABC. For example, she claims she was in the presence of both former President Clinton (after January 20, 2001, and before the summer of 2002) and former Vice President Gore (and his wife) at Mr. Epstein's Virgin Island home. I have be

he claims she was in the presence of both former President Clinton (after January 20, 2001, and before the summer of

ssured into including Professor Dershowitz in her allegations and that she has a financial motive in making these allegations. The Duke of York and the Royal Palace have likewise unequivocally denied Jane Doe's similar allegations against the Duke. Surely, these unequivocal statements of denial of respected mem

rince or Professor Dershowitz that would make them less credible than their uncorroborated accuser. Jane Doe 3 claims she saw both former President Clinton (after January 20, 2001 and before the summer of 2002) and former Vice President Gore (and his wife) at Mr. Epstein's Virgin Island home. She claim

d accuser. Jane Doe 3 claims she saw both former President Clinton (after January 20, 2001 and before the summer of

ve funds herself) from a businessperson who would persuasively deny that he ever had any sexual contact with Jane Doe 3. Likewise, Prince Andrew and the Royal Palace have unequivocally denied similar allegations of sexual conduct by Prince Andrew. Surely there is nothing in the background of either the Prince or

ination whether your interviewee is entitled to disseminate her accusations to a national audience. Jane Doe 3 claims she saw both former President Clinton (after January 20, 2001 and before the summer of 2002) and former Vice President Gore (and his wife) at Mr. Epstein's Virgin Island home. She claim

audience. Jane Doe 3 claims she saw both former President Clinton (after January 20, 2001 and before the summer of

ly there is nothing in the background of Professor Dershowitz that would make him less credible than their uncorroborated accuser Prince Andrew and the Royal Palace have also unequivocally denied similar allegations of sexual conduct by Prince Andrew. Their denials as well are entitled to weight in your determi

ination whether your interviewee is entitled to disseminate her accusations to a national audience. Jane Doe 3 claims she saw both former President Clinton (after January 20, 2001 and before the summer of 2002) and former Vice President Gore (and his wife) at Mr. Epstein's Virgin Island home. She claim

audience. Jane Doe 3 claims she saw both former President Clinton (after January 20, 2001 and before the summer of

ly there is nothing in the background of Professor Dershowitz that would make him less credible than their uncorroborated accuser Prince Andrew and the Royal Palace have also unequivocally denied similar allegations of sexual conduct by Prince Andrew. Their denials as well are entitled to weight in your determi