Epstein Secrets

er to entice my clients into believing that Bill Clinton was on the airplane with Mr. Epstein and these y

Mr. Edwards and the firm put sensational allegations in the LM case that they knew were not true, in order to entice my clients into believing that Bill Clinton was on the airplane with Mr. Epstein and these young woman ..." (18:24-19:4.) • "I can't conceive that Mr. Edwards and the predecessor law firm wo

must be rejected in favor of the truth. See Loureiro v. State, 133 So. 3d 948, 956 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)("A trial must be a search for the truth."); Katzman v. Rediron Fabrication, Inc., 76 So. 3d 1060, 1063 (Fla. 48' DCA 2011)("...jury can the search for truth and justice be accomplished"). Not only ar

t organizations by the United States government. See Bohn II, 291 F.3d at 1002 (noting Hamas was designated a terrorist organization by President Clinton in 1995 and by the Sec- retary of State in 1997); see also Consoli- dated Plaintiffs Opp. to Prince Sultan's Motion to Dismiss at 16-17 (citing Pate

amas was designated a terrorist organization by President Clinton in 1995 and by the Sec- retary of State in 1997);

"Civil RICO is an unusually potent weapon ... 'courts should strive to flush out frivo- lous RICO allegations at an early stage of the litigation." Katzman v. Victoria's Se- cret, 167 F.R.D. 649, 655 (S.D.N.Y.1996). [74] The Federal complaint asserts a RICO claim under § 1962(a), which states in part

rorist organizations by the United States government. See Bown I, 291 F.3d at 1002 (noting Hamas was designated a terrorist organization by President Clinton in 1995 and by the Sec- retary of State in 1997); see also Consoli- dated Plaintiffs’ Opp. to Prince Sultan’s Motion to Dismiss at 16-17 (citing Flat

Hamas was designated a terrorist organization by President Clinton in 1995 and by the Sec- retary of State in 1997);

. “Civil RICO is an unusually potent weapon . ‘courts should strive to flush out frivo- lous RICO allegations at an early stage of the litigation.’” Katzman v. Victoria’s Se- cret, 167 F.R.D. 649, 655 (S.D.N.Y.1996). [74] The Federal complaint asserts a RICO claim under § 1962(a), which states in part: “