Epstein Secrets

7th Cir. 2005) 3, 4 EFTA00156339 United States v. McGrain, No. 6:20-cr-06113 (EAW), 2022 WL 287350 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2022) 13 United States v. Patterson, 576 F.3d 431 (7th Cir. 2009) 21 United States v. Pope, 554 F.3d 240 (2d Cir. 2009) 14 United States v. Reuter, 463 F.3d 792 (7th Cir. 2006)

hether the alleged conspiracy continued beyond the effective date of the new penalty is one that must be submitted to the jury."); United States v. Tykarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 478-480 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[B]ecause the communications spanned two different versions of the statute [18 U.S.C. § 2422] with different

States v. Suarez, No. 21-1721, 2022 WL 1449174 (3d Cir. May 9, 2022) 13 United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205 (2d Cir. 1990) 3 United States v. Tykarsky, 446 F.3d 458 (3d Cir. 2006) 3 United States v. Watkins, 667 F.3d 254 (2d Cir. 2012) 20 Statutes Child Protection and Sexual Predator Punishme

explicit conversation with ofc., set up meeting on internet for purpose of having sex; arrested at meeting site. (Affidavit attached). 01-1139 James Patterson 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing as 13 y.o. girl) on internet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with ofc., set up meeting

ting site. (Affidavit attached). 01-1139 James Patterson 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing as 13 y.o.

nvince, or to try to convince, her to engage in conduct proscribed by law, the statute may not be unconstitutional on its face. See United States'. Tykarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 470 (3d Cir. 2006) (both §§ 2422(b) and 2423(6) "fall squarely Congress's power to regulate the first two categories of activities d

01-1004 Fenys Miranda 1 [None] 01-1139 James Patterson [None) 01-1174 Roberto Gonzalez 1 [None] c

sexually explicit EFTA00284203 01-0961 Jose Mayorga 1 [None) 01-0998 Gustavo Desoun 1 [None] 01-1004 Fenys Miranda 1 [None] 01-1139 James Patterson [None) 01-1174 Roberto Gonzalez 1 [None] conversation with ofc., set up meeting on Internet for purpose of having sex; arrested at meeting

vince, or to try to convince, her to engage in conduct proscribed by law, the statute may not be unconstitutional on its face. See United States v. Tykarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 470 (3d Cir. 2006) (both §§ 2422(b) and 2423(b) "fall squarely within Congress's power to regulate the first two categories of activ