Epstein Secrets

From: Kathy Ruemmler > Sent: Friday, March 18, To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Patterson On the shuttle back to NYC. Abou= to take off. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 18, 20=6, at 11:41 AM, jeffrey E. [email protected] <mailto:jeevaca

tive=media controversy than they are of legal threats): 2) The actual a=thor of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, J=mes Patterson. Connolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstei=, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity Fair, has refused to allow him t= write ab

e a=le to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say th=t they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patters=n's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have som= thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience. That being said

er, and while he isn't re=arded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy.=Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp=up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more t=an anything you've encountered before. Meanwhile--=/div

2016 at 12:30 PM, Martin G. Weinberg <=1.1e wrote: I like points 2,3 below but worry that too early a warning will simply result in their papering Patterson's participation thus blunting any concern for how they exploit Patterson's name. The points, however, feel strong and I would want to know more abo

legal threats): 1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not publishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the questionable nature of the book; EFTA00831397 2) The actual author of the b

r, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered before. Meanwhile— In a

From: Michael Wolff < Mila> To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Patterson Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:39:39 +0000 A few things to think about: If the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time fra

legal threats): I) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not publishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the questionable nature of the book; 2) The actual author of the book, John Conn

er, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered before. Meanwhile-- In a

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 4:19 PM To: Kathy Ruemmler Subject: Re: Patterson Nuts On Friday, 18 March 2016, Kathy Ruemmler < > wrote= On the shuttle b=ck to NYC. About to take off. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 18, 2016, at

legal threats): 1) Little, Brown =as made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalis= that it was not publishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstei=--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the questionable nature of t=e book; 2) The actual author of the b=ok, John Conn

er, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surel= be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the elec=ion, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, p=ssibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered=before. Meanwhile-- In a