5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
8 / 5
Mentions
explicit conversation with ofc., set up meeting on internet for purpose of having sex; arrested at meeting site. (Affidavit attached). 01-1139 James Patterson 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing as 13 y.o. girl) on internet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with ofc., set up meeting
ting site. (Affidavit attached). 01-1139 James Patterson 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing as 13 y.o.
is addressed to those who purposely and intentionally target children. Here, there was no such targeting. As the Sixth Circuit said in rejecting a First Amendment challenge to the statute: "The statute only applies to those who `knowingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or enticesminors. United St
01-1004 Fenys Miranda 1 [None] 01-1139 James Patterson [None) 01-1174 Roberto Gonzalez 1 [None] c
sexually explicit EFTA00284203 01-0961 Jose Mayorga 1 [None) 01-0998 Gustavo Desoun 1 [None] 01-1004 Fenys Miranda 1 [None] 01-1139 James Patterson [None) 01-1174 Roberto Gonzalez 1 [None] conversation with ofc., set up meeting on Internet for purpose of having sex; arrested at meeting
is addressed to those who purposely and intentionally target children. Here, there was no such targeting. As the Sixth Circuit said in rejecting a First Amendment challenge to the statute: "The statute only applies to those who `knowingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice, minors. United S
ting site. (Affidavit attached). 01-1139 James Patterson I ]None] D met u/c officer (posing as 13 y.o.
explicit conversation with ofc., set up meeting on intemet for purpose of having sex; arrested at meeting site. (Affidavit attached). 01-1139 James Patterson I ]None] D met u/c officer (posing as 13 y.o. girl) on intemet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with ofc., set up meeting o
is addressed to those who purposely and intentionally target children. Here, there was no such targeting. As the Sixth Circuit said in rejecting a First Amendment challenge to the statute: "The statute only applies to those who ' owingly' persuade or entice, or attempt If to persuade or entice, minors. Unite
tch Ltd.. L.P., No. 03 Civ. 1382 RWS, 2003 WL 23018833 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2003) 10, 11 Oppenheimer Fund. Inc. v. Sanders 437 U.S. 340 (1978) 10 Patterson v. Burge. No. 03 C 4433, 2005 WL 43240 (N.D. III. Jan 6, 2005) 4.5 Persky v. Yeshiva Univ. No. 01 Civ. 4278 (LMM). 2002 WL 31769704 (S.D.N.Y. Dec
§ 79-h(b), (c).° But the Court need not even consider the scope of the reporter's privilege or if it has been waived. Without relying on an explicit First Amendment, common law or statutory privilege, under Rules 26 and 45, federal courts have nonetheless factored in the burden on First Amendment rights when an
tch Ltd.. L.P., No. 03 Civ. 1382 RWS, 2003 WL 23018833 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2003) 10, 11 Oppenheimer Fund. Inc. v. Sanders 437 U.S. 340 (1978) 10 Patterson v. Burge. No. 03 C 4433, 2005 WL 43240 (N.D. III. Jan 6, 2005) 4.5 Persky v. Yeshiva Univ. No. 01 Civ. 4278 (LMM). 2002 WL 31769704 (S.D.N.Y. Dec
§ 79-h(b), (c).° But the Court need not even consider the scope of the reporter's privilege or if it has been waived. Without relying on an explicit First Amendment, common law or statutory privilege, under Rules 26 and 45, federal courts have nonetheless factored in the burden on First Amendment rights when an
Entities connected to both James Patterson and First Amendment

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Eric Trump
PERSON
Michael Jackson
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Michael Wolff
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONEmmy Taylor
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON