Epstein Secrets

erica by the U.S. Probation Office New York City Staff." The sole claim is asserted under the Crime Victims' Rights Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, Hoffenbcrg has been convicted of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy to obstruct SEC proceedings, 18 U.S.C. § 371, mail fraud, 1

TRY OF CAPE VERDE, CORPORATE EMPLOYEE PENSION UNIONS, CHURCHES, AND INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS IN TOWERS FINANCIAL CORP. WHO ARE THE BENEFICIARIES OF STEVEN HOFFENBERG'S JUDGE SWEET ORDERED $475 MILLION RESTITUTION THAT IS NOW UNDER TWO BILLION DOLLARS PLUS ACCRUED INTEREST, -against- USDS SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRON

1 million fine. United States v, Hoffenberg, 94 Cr. 213 (RWS) (Docket # 149). In au Order dated December 11, 2013, Judge Sweet modified the terms of Hoffenberg's supervised release to impose, among other restrictions, a prohibition from engaging in direct contact with his victims. (94 Cr. 213, Docket # 145

Hoffenberg at the time of a scheduled 'netting with his probation officer. (Petition at 9.) It annexes a November 8, 2013 memo from Hewitson to the "Steven Hoffenberg File" with the boldface label "Attorney Work Product," in which Hewitson recounts her efforts to attend the 8:45 a.m. meeting between Hoffenberg and his

portion of the population of the country of Cape Verde. (Petition at 3.) The petition identifies only one petitioner, however: an individual named Rey Marques, whose "Emergency Retainer Agreement" with Mintz & Prude is annexed to the petition. (Petition at 3 & Ex. A.) Marques claims to have "been a witness

SEC proceedings, 18 U.S.C. § 371, mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 & 2, and tax evasion, 21 U.S.C. § 7201. In 1997, Judge Sweet of this Court sentenced HofTenberg to 240 months of imprisonment, three years of supervised release, restitution in the amount of $475,157,340 and a $1 million fine. United States v.

TRY OF CAPE VERDE, CORPORATE EMPLOYEE PENSION UNIONS, CHURCHES, AND INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS IN TOWERS FINANCIAL CORP. WHO ARE THE BENEFICIARIES OF STEVEN HOPFENBERG'S JUDGE SWEET ORDERED $475 MILLION RESTITUTION THAT IS NOW UNDER TWO BILLION DOLLARS PLUS ACCRUED INTEREST, -against- USDS SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRON

1 million fine. United States v. Hoffenberg, 94 Cr. 213 (RWS) (Docket # 149). In an Order dated December 11, 2013, Judge Sweet modified the terms of Hoffenberg's supervised release to impose, among other restrictions, a prohibition front engaging in direct contact with his victims. (94 Cr. 213, Docket # 14

Hoffenberg at the time of a scheduled meeting with his probation officer. (Petition at 9.) It annexes a November 8, 2013 memo from Hewitson to the "Steven Hoffenberg File" with the boldface label "Attorney Work Product," in which Hewitson recounts her efforts to attend the 8:45 a.m. meeting between Hoffenberg and his

portion of the population of the country of Cape Verde. (Petition at 3.) The petition identifies only one petitioner, however: an individual named Rey Marques, whose "Emergency Retainer Agreement" with Mintz & Fraade is annexed to the petition. (Petition at 3 & Ex. A.) Marques claims to have "been a witnes

Judge Sweet ordered a status conference for December 5, 2013. The Petition was directly related to the December 5, 2013 Status Conference Regarding Steven Hoffenberg Case #: 4346 Docket #: 95-cr-00213-001. At this status conference, Judge Sweet questioned why the papers had been sealed. 20. At the time the Petition

ly prohibits a lawyer from simultaneously representing clients with differing interests, in the narrow circumstances of M&F's representation of Mr. Hoffenberg in connection with his supervised release and the Petitioners with respect to the issue of permitting Mr. Hoffenberg to engage in activities which

of the Towers Financial fraud, Mr. Hoffenberg, following his release from incarceration on October 11, 2013 and (B) the retention of our firm by Mr. Rey Marques, one of the victims of the Towers Financial fraud. 5. We, respectfully, would like to offer more facts to explain why we do not believe that our