Epstein Secrets

erica by the U.S. Probation Office New York City Staff." The sole claim is asserted under the Crime Victims' Rights Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, Hoffenbcrg has been convicted of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy to obstruct SEC proceedings, 18 U.S.C. § 371, mail fraud, 1

TRY OF CAPE VERDE, CORPORATE EMPLOYEE PENSION UNIONS, CHURCHES, AND INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS IN TOWERS FINANCIAL CORP. WHO ARE THE BENEFICIARIES OF STEVEN HOFFENBERG'S JUDGE SWEET ORDERED $475 MILLION RESTITUTION THAT IS NOW UNDER TWO BILLION DOLLARS PLUS ACCRUED INTEREST, -against- USDS SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRON

1 million fine. United States v, Hoffenberg, 94 Cr. 213 (RWS) (Docket # 149). In au Order dated December 11, 2013, Judge Sweet modified the terms of Hoffenberg's supervised release to impose, among other restrictions, a prohibition from engaging in direct contact with his victims. (94 Cr. 213, Docket # 145

Hoffenberg at the time of a scheduled 'netting with his probation officer. (Petition at 9.) It annexes a November 8, 2013 memo from Hewitson to the "Steven Hoffenberg File" with the boldface label "Attorney Work Product," in which Hewitson recounts her efforts to attend the 8:45 a.m. meeting between Hoffenberg and his

he obstruction by the United States Government which is alleged herein ...." (Petition at 3.) Remarkably, the Mintz & Fraade retainer agreement with Marques states, "We hereby advise 3 According to the petition, Hoffenberg also has filed an application with Judge Sweet that seeks permission "to leave th

SEC proceedings, 18 U.S.C. § 371, mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 & 2, and tax evasion, 21 U.S.C. § 7201. In 1997, Judge Sweet of this Court sentenced HofTenberg to 240 months of imprisonment, three years of supervised release, restitution in the amount of $475,157,340 and a $1 million fine. United States v.

TRY OF CAPE VERDE, CORPORATE EMPLOYEE PENSION UNIONS, CHURCHES, AND INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS IN TOWERS FINANCIAL CORP. WHO ARE THE BENEFICIARIES OF STEVEN HOPFENBERG'S JUDGE SWEET ORDERED $475 MILLION RESTITUTION THAT IS NOW UNDER TWO BILLION DOLLARS PLUS ACCRUED INTEREST, -against- USDS SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRON

1 million fine. United States v. Hoffenberg, 94 Cr. 213 (RWS) (Docket # 149). In an Order dated December 11, 2013, Judge Sweet modified the terms of Hoffenberg's supervised release to impose, among other restrictions, a prohibition front engaging in direct contact with his victims. (94 Cr. 213, Docket # 14

Hoffenberg at the time of a scheduled meeting with his probation officer. (Petition at 9.) It annexes a November 8, 2013 memo from Hewitson to the "Steven Hoffenberg File" with the boldface label "Attorney Work Product," in which Hewitson recounts her efforts to attend the 8:45 a.m. meeting between Hoffenberg and his

obstruction by the United States Government which is alleged herein .. . ." (Petition at 3.) Remarkably, the Mintz & Fraade retainer agreement with Marques states, "We hereby advise 3 According to the petition, Hoffenberg also has filed an application with Judge Sweet that seeks permission "to leave th

al Corporation, ("TFC") a dissolved Nevada corporation which had its principal place of business in New York, NY at all relevant times during which Steven Hoffenberg ("Hoffenberg") was an officer, director and controlled a majority of its stock. 2. Epstein, a co-conspirator in connection with the fraudulent Pon

ntly acquired through fraudulent Ponzi schemes described herein and without disclosure of the Epstein Fraudulent Activities. 7. In or around 1997, Hoffenberg was convicted for a Ponzi scheme in connection with securities frauds committed at TFC (the "TFC Ponzi Fraud"), which resulted in approximately fiv

individually, and as President and Chief Executive Officer of The Financial Trust Company, XYZ Corp., and ABC, Inc., as follows: PARTIES 1. Mr. Marques and Mr. are residents of and , respectively, and were investors and/or noteholders in Towers Financial Corporation, ("TFC") a dissolved Nev

Judge Sweet ordered a status conference for December 5, 2013. The Petition was directly related to the December 5, 2013 Status Conference Regarding Steven Hoffenberg Case #: 4346 Docket #: 95-cr-00213-001. At this status conference, Judge Sweet questioned why the papers had been sealed. 20. At the time the Petition

ly prohibits a lawyer from simultaneously representing clients with differing interests, in the narrow circumstances of M&F's representation of Mr. Hoffenberg in connection with his supervised release and the Petitioners with respect to the issue of permitting Mr. Hoffenberg to engage in activities which

to Mr. Hoffenberg which if collected Mr. Hoffenberg could become a source through which Mr. Hoffenberg could begin to pay his restitution. 22. Mr. Marques was concerned that the restrictions being imposed would restrain Mr. Hoffenberg from performing his restitution efforts. Due to the urgency of the i