Epstein Secrets

District Court Southern District of New York Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square, Room 2104 New York. New York 10007 Re: Steven Jude Hoffenberg v. Jeffrey E. Epstein, et al. (Index No. 1:I6-ev-03989) Dear Judge Sullivan: Reference is made to the Defendants' letter to the Court (the "Defend

lve the issues raised in the Defendants' Letter, we believe that it is necessary to evaluate the long history between Mr. Jeffrey E. Epstein and Mr. Steven J. HofTenberg and their involvement in Towers Financial Corporations' ("TFC") Ponzi fraud, which includes many fraudulent securities offerings of promissory notes

otes and bonds by TFC, (the Page 1 of 3 EFTA00592314 Case 1:16-cv-03989-RJS Document 20 Filed 06/29/16 Page 2 of 3 "TFC Ponzi Fraud"). It is Mr. Hoffenberg's position that Mr. Epstein's fraudulent actions and engagement in the TFC Ponzi Fraud with Mr. Hoffenberg and TFC resulted in over 200,000 victims

40 Foley Square, Room 2104 New York. New York 10007 Re: Steven Jude Hoffenberg v. Jeffrey E. Epstein, et al. (Index No. 1:I6-ev-03989) Dear Judge Sullivan: Reference is made to the Defendants' letter to the Court (the "Defendants' Letter") which was filed yesterday, June 28, 2016, via the Electronic C

York Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square, Room 2104 New York, New York 10007 ([email protected]) Re: Steven Jude Hoffenberg v. Jeffrey E. Epstein, et al. (Index No. 1:16-cv-039891 Dear Judge Sullivan: Our firm represents Mr. Steven Jude Hoffenberg, the Plaintiff in the

(RWS), 95 Cr. 321 (RWS), 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2394 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 1997) ("Hoffenberg"). Honorable Robert W. Sweet, D.J. was presiding Judge in Hoffenberg, in which Mr. Hoffenberg was convicted of conspiracy to violate securities laws by fraudulently selling securities, mail and wire fraud, conspiracy

York 10007 (Sullivan[email protected]) Re: Steven Jude Hoffenberg v. Jeffrey E. Epstein, et al. (Index No. 1:16-cv-039891 Dear Judge Sullivan: Our firm represents Mr. Steven Jude Hoffenberg, the Plaintiff in the above-referenced matter. The Complaint in the above-referenced matter (the "C

,;nk 01;1ce sJJJ;~d him for defaulting on ;i, $20 million lo,an. The a:rtide suggested that one of his business mentors ·and previous employers was Steven Hoff en berg, riow serving a prison term after "bilking investors out of more than $450mill.ion in one of th_e la_rgest Ppnzi ,schemes in A:merlcan hfstory." As

siness mentors arid previous employers was Steven Hoffenberg, riow serving a prison term after "bilking invest

a situation where there was tremendous controversy over what happened in the case and whether or not the prosecutors went off the reservation. Judge Sullivan — and there were three or four independent — not independent, DOJ inquiries into the very same matter. But Judge Sullivan wanted his own opportunity