Epstein Secrets

5439090 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2015) 7 In re Terrorist Attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, 454 F. Supp. 2d 220 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) 15 Landmark Commcins, Inc. v. Virginia, 435 U.S. 829 (1978) 10 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) passim Mitchell v. Fishbein, 227 F.R.D. 239 (S.D.N.Y.

iminal case against Mr. Epstein, which include the now-settled above-captioned action. Here, the underlying claim is a defamation action brought by Virginia Giuffre ("Ms. " or "Plaintiff') against Ghislaine Maxwell ("Ms. Maxwell" or "Defendant") on the grounds that Ms. Maxwell, in coordination with Mr. Epstein

claim is a defamation action brought by Virginia Giuffre ("Ms. " or "Plaintiff') against Ghislaine Maxwe

nesses, endanger national security, reveal trade secrets, or implicate duty to protect attorney-client material or confidential client information); Hardy, 2017 WL 6805707, at *6-7 (unsealing transcript of settlement between workers' union and, inter alia, the Trump Organization and holding that, unde

Plot. The Kearney (NE) Hub (7/13, 80K) reports Hyrum T. Wilson of Nebraska and William Burgamy IV of Maryland "appeared Friday in federal court in Virginia," where they "pleaded guilty to conspiracy to use explosives, conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and money laundering." Prosecutors "sa

rces in identifying the estimated sale price." FBI Continues Probe Of Independence, Missouri Government. The Kansas City (MO) Star (7/13, Hancock, Hardy, Vockrodt, 549K) reports, "The FBI has once again requested records from Independence City Hall, the latest in a series of inquiries by federal aut

casgamge26143R-ficsarnecobalrgefiFiW044136§fgheatmbefilth 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Virginia L. Giuffre, Plaintiff, v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS INTERVENORS' JULIE BROWN AND MIAMI HERALD MEDIA CO.'S RESPONSE TO MAXWE

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Virginia L. Giuffre, Plaintiff, v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant.

judicial documents and that reflected sensitive information about cooperating witnesses and the government's investigative methods and techniques); Hardy v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc'y of United States, 697 F. App'x 723, 725 (2d Cir. 2017) (noting generally that protection of ongoing investigation

DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant.

supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item. Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-CV-07433-LAP, 2020 WL 1547377, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2020); DE 1044.' Based on the Court's clarification of its March 31, 202

involved in an investigation"; "[t]tle district court was in the best position to weigh these factors") (internal quotations and citation omitted); Hardy, 697 Fed. App'x at 725 (2d Cir. 2017) (noting that courts have found that the following can defeat presumption of access: protection of ongoing inv