Epstein Secrets

package that was provided to you 22 by counsel for Mr. Edwards there is a statement or 23 interview that is with a young lady by the name of 24 Virginia Roberts. Now, I don't know whether you 25 have had an opportunity to read it or not. www.phippereporting.com 888 811-3408 001216 EFTA00613513 7 1 T

:3,25 57:16 violations (2) Wbk@searcyl... 2:21 [email protected]... 39:23 46:21 50:15,16 48:18 12:16,17 2:6 48:12 51:2 trouble (1) United (1) Virginia (2) weaken (1) times (2) 51:4 3:17 6:24 7:13 37:5 20:25 32:17 troubled (1) unrelated (3) vis-a-vis (1) WEISS (1) timing (1) 49:13 18:21

rivilege. 12 But as I've indicated, the most cogent and 13 well articulated opinion on this subject is 14 Judge Sasser's opinion in Johnson vs. Libow. She 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 expressly revoked the arguments that are raised by Wolfe, which arguments, of course, are opposed

9 MR. KING: That is the decision in -- bear 20 with me, Judge. 21 THE COURT: No problem. 22 MR. KING: That is the decision in Johnson 23 vs. Libow, a 2012 -- Westlaw 4068409 in 2012. 24 THE COURT: Okay. 25 MR. KING: It is concise. It's to the cogent, most well-reasoned, and rejects those p

GORDON,SCOTT LEVINSON,BARBARA BURKE,VIRGINIA GALLEY,RICHARD J DE TOMASO,ISABELLE

BERMUDA HOUSE DEZIEL,ROBERT E LEBOW,PATRICIA GROW,RICHARD D GAY JR,JOHN

Second Renewed Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages; Exhibit “D” — Edwards’ Notice of Filing of Transcript of Telephone Interview of Virginia Roberts in Support of Motion for Leave to Amended to Assert Punitive Damages; Exhibit “E” — Transcript of Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein dated January 25, 20

e perhaps malicious prosecution, for testimony or other sworn statements which he or she gives in the course of the subject proceeding.”); Johnson v. Libow, 2012 WL 4068409 (Fla. 15th Jud. Cir. March 1, 2012)(the purpose of the litigation privilege does not preclude the tort of malicious prosecution). I