Epstein Secrets

t PM 13 months of me sentence. hating eamea gain tine for rod behavfor. ROM Beath Poky began frivesboieg IMarnalonel monewitan of mystery.' as the Now York magazine dubbed Nm, aloe they Moved a Gametal' ken a reheats data-yea-cid girl who had given Epstein a naked manage at It horns on tab intraeCiaati

s to why s wits made .. ard any the ØY were sold down PA rier' Fenner Went prOttecultx Ryon McCabe described me agreement as 'eery unorthodox.' Such Kamen" he sad. N essay reserved tor Cataleens. not Ind 'noels L-` sne e) wra Wgb 54,~ by YAHOO, 0bama bunches Mortgage Relief Plan it you owe less !ha

the present action, the state with the most significant relationship to the transaction is New York: the contract being sued upon was executed in Ncw York. defendant Ep- stein Is a New York citizen. and I.A.G. is a New York corporation. Moreover, both parties agree that New York law applies in this ca

landlord-tenant disputes involving the Gov- ernment, there is no "distinct need" for a nationwide legal standard or a uniform na- tional rule. See Kamen, 500 U.S. at 98 Ill S.Ct, 1711. Landlord-tenant law traditional- ly has been a matter of state law. There is no compelling reason to disrupt expect

—FIRST DEPARTMENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. APPENDIX CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. NEW YORK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE One Hogan Place New York, New York 10013 Attorneys for Respondent JAY P. LEFICOWTIZ SANDRA LYNN MUSUMECI KIRK AND &

ffenses proscribed in the following statutes or similar °Horne In another jtrisclIctlen: s. 787.01, s. 787.0‘ or s. 767.025(2)(c), whore the victim Kamen and the defendant is not ctim's parent or guarding s. 794.011 including s. 794.011(10); s. 794.05* s. 796.03; s. 796.035; s. 800.04; s. 935.1025-