Epstein Secrets

ditionally, general jurisdic- tion could be appropriate for the SAAR Network entities having offices in Virgi- nia. Id, 1227. Accordingly, the SAAR Network's motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice. The parties are to en- gage in jurisdictional discovery to deter- mine which of the Network's entit

Popilock, Sean P. Car- ter, Stephen A. Cozen, Cozen O'Connor (Philadelphia), Philadelphia, PA, for Plain- tiffs. David P. Gersch, Arnold & Porter, L.L.P., Donna M. Sheinbach, Michael D. McNeely, Nancy Luque, Steven A. Mad- dox, Gray Cary Ware and Friedenrich LLP (DC), Mitchell Rand Berger, Ronald St

the present action, the state with the most significant relationship to the transaction is New York: the contract being sued upon was executed in Ncw York. defendant Ep- stein Is a New York citizen. and I.A.G. is a New York corporation. Moreover, both parties agree that New York law applies in this ca

ry Demand: None Nature of Suit: 190 Contract Other Jurisdiction: Diversity represented by Marshall H. Fishman Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel, L.L.P. 919 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 WIRty represented by Gerald B. Lefcourt Law Office Gerald B. Lefcourt 148 East 78th Street New York, NY 10

y under authority of Section 6(C), Article IV. Ohio Constitution. *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" SUPREME COURT CIVIL SUITS FOR NEW YORK COUNTY, NEW YORK CASE-NAME: D.B. ZWIRN & CO., L.P. , DBZ GP, LLC, ZWIRN HOLDINGS, LLC AND DANIEL ZWIRN v. For internal use only SDNY_GM_00054732 CONF

L Laboratories (1994), 316 S.C. 505, 508, 450 S.E.2d 624, affirmed (1995), 319 S.C. 79, 459 S.E.2d 850. Accord Citicasters Co. v. Bricker & Eckler, L.L.P., 149 Ohio App.3d 705, 2002 Ohio 5814, at P7, 778 N.E.2d 663. For internal use only SDNY_GM_00054730 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(F IDENTI