Epstein Secrets

SONY-0022332 EFTA_00 170058 EFTA01296726 Page 2 No. Address 2: 301 E 66TH ST APT 10B NEW YORK. NY 10065-6216 NEW YORK COUNTY 3: 301 E 66TH ST MANHATTAN, NY 10021-6205 NEW YORK COUNTY 4: 358 EL BRILLO WAY PALM BEACH. FL 33480-4730 PALM BEACH COUNTY 5: 457 MADISON AVE FL 4TH NEW YORK. NY 10022-

NEW YORK. NY 10028.4714 315 E 86TH ST APT 16LE NEW YORK, NY 10028-4780 455 SCHUTT ROAD EXT APT 616 MIDDLETOWN. NY 10940-2590 (845) 381-5016 16 L NEW YORK, NY 10028 1 LEAPT 16 NEW YORK NY 10028 265 E 66TH ST APT 33D NEW YORK, NY 10065.6409 265 E 66TH ST APT 31F NEW YORK, NY 10065.6409 (646) 657-0

CHE BANK AGII Full Name Address County Phone EPSTEIN. JEFFERY E 9 E 71ST ST NEW YORK (212) 750-9895 NEW YORK. NY 10021-4102 (212) 249.1122 NEW YORK COUNTY (212) 772-9416 ADDITIONAL PERSONAL INFORMATION SSN DOB Gender LexID(sm) 090-44-XXXX 111953 Male 000752546965 (Age 64) Subject Summary Na

e level of conduct that triggers an exception to the work product doctrine. See, e.g., In re Sealed Case, 754 F.2d 395, 401, 244 U.S. App. D.C. 11 (D.C. Cir. 1985) (exception to attorney- client privilege applied where alleged wrongdoing included "perjured testimony, document destruction, and similar mis

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza Ncw York, Ncw York 10007 January 16, 2019 BY E-MAIL Iterative Capital / Iterative OTC LLC do Robert H. Heitz Jr., Esq. Akin Gump LLP Dear Mr. Hotz: Ple

s an "'appendage of the court" and it "depend[s] on the judiciary in its role as an investigative body." United States v. Seals, 130 F.3d 451, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (quoting Brown v. United States, 359 U.S. 41, 49 (1959)). As relevant here, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has

ith . Their telephone number is at their dorm room on campus (roommates). Maxwell and Epstein allegedly have a private plane and frequently go to Now York leaving them out of the area for extended periods of time." Numerous attempts were made to roach the girls at the above listed number with negativ

ity of Bellingham 780 P,2d 272, 275-76 (Wash. App. 1989) (collecting cases). See also Bur. of Nat'l Affairs v. U.S. Delft. of Justice 742 F.3d 1484 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (holding that personal appointment materials, such as calendars and daily agendas for the convenience of Assistant Attorney General, are not

DEVELOPMENTS In the summer of 2009, allegations surfaced that Epstein had cooperated with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York’s investigation of investment bank Bear Stearns, and that he had been released early from his 18-month imprisonment term because of that

non-prosecution agreement or a related and similar mechanism, a deferred prosecution agreement. United States v. Fokker Servs. B.V., 818 F.3d 733 (D.C. Cir. 2016). These agreements “afford a middle-ground option to the prosecution when, for example, it believes that a criminal conviction may be diffic