Epstein Secrets

experience in the administration of criminal justice both on the state and on the federal level. I was employed as an Assistant District Attorney in New York County from February 1962 until October 1965. One of the investigations I was responsible for was the death of Malcolm X. From 1965 until 1969 I was employ

640 (1l d' Cir. 1999)• USA States v.Panfil 338 F.3d 1299 (11° Cir. 2003); United States v. Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 Ws Cir. 1999). United States v. Burgess, 175 F.3d 1261 (11° Cir. 1999). United States v. Roias, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (111° Cir. 2005); United States v. Root 296 F. 3d 1222 (11 ° Cir. 2002).

experience in the administration of criminal justice both on the state and on the federal level. I was employed as an Assistant District Attorney in New York County from February 1962 until October 1965. One of the investigations I was responsible for was the death of Malcolm X. From 1965 until 1969 I was employ

95 F.3d 640 (11th Cir. 1999)• United States 338 F.3d 1299 (1 Ph Cir. 2003); United States'. Garrett 190 F.3d 1220 (11s Cir. 1999); United States'. Burgess, 175 F.3d 1261 (11° Cir. 1999)' United States '- Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005); United States'. Root 296 F. 3d 1222 (11th Cir. 2002).

ivision Hawthorne, New York E. T. Mueller IBM Research Division Hawthorne, New York EFTA00176597 D. Riecken !BM Research Division Hawthorne, Ncw York M. Singh IBM Research Division Hawthorne, Ncw York P. Singh Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts IAC-CREATE-DATE: Se

11* Cir. 1999); United States1 &mill, supra, 338 F.3d 1299 (11* Cir. 2003); United Stalest. Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 1999); United States' Burgess, 175 F.3d j261 (11th Cir. 1999); United States' Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11* Cir. 2005); United States'. Root, 296 F.3d 1222 (11th Cir. 2002). Un

d that defendant induced woman to travel in interstate commerce to engage in prostitution, even though woman claimed she had always wanted to go to Ncw York and she paid her own way. 4) LaPage 1 U.S., 146 1 2d 536 (8" Cir. 1945). Evidence that defendant called victim, who was one of his regular prostitu

United States' Tillman, 195 I3d 640 (I I t° Cir.' 9); United States' Panfil, supra, 338 I 1299 (116 Cii 2003); United States v. 1999); United &awl Burgess, 175 .3d r61(II.Ci 1999); United States! Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11° Cir. 2005); United States Root, 296 3d 1222 (11° Cir. 200 ). United State