Epstein Secrets

D: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/28/2023 2:22:44 PM l • • U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney | Southern District, ofNew York The Silvio J. Mblld Building One Saint Andrew ’s Plaza New.York- New York 10007 July 8, 2019 VTAECF The: Honorable Henry Pitman United States Distric

ly reported, the defendant is extraordinarily wealthy, and he owns and I maintains luxury properties and residences around the world, including in !Vlanhattan, New York; Palm Beach, Florida; Stanley, New Mexico; and Paris, France. Addition!ally, Epstein owns a private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands whi

h at least 2005, JEFFREY EPSTEIN enticed and recruited, and caused to be entice_d and recruited, 'oo.ze_ns. of minor girls. to visit his mansiprJ in New Yo.Jk, New·York, (the "New Y/:>rk Residence"), arid his estate in Palm Beach', Florida (the "Palm Beach Residence"),, to ,engage in sex acts with him,

2005, JEFFREY EPSTEIN enticed and recruited, and caused to be entice_d and recruited, 'oo.ze_ns. of minor girls. to visit his mansiprJ in New Yo.Jk, New·York, (the "New Y/:>rk Residence"), arid his estate in Palm Beach', Florida (the "Palm Beach Residence"),, to ,engage in sex acts with him, after which

. In this way, EPSTEIN created a vast network of underage victlms for him to sexually, exploit, .oft.en or, a dailY, l:>asis; in locations including New Yqrk c1ng Palm Beach. EPSJEIN's victims were as young as. 14 at the tim_e he abused them, and were, .for various reasons, often particularly vu Iner.abl

ZZO, CLERK. 3 28 2023 2:22:44 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY • Entered .on FLSD Docket 03/,21/2011 Page 15, of 15 I Dac-DT-07 il•:!b11 FrorFowlu-whl t, Burnett I mmm1 r-,ss P.ooum M_T& I AJJ!niiadu I. Je5,,y B. E~da hereby n~llffiim thi: NmrProseagtign Ap:cmc:Dt and. ~ddemd:lnn m liADlC -4 Oc:tiJbm-

imbed as investors worried that the huge surplus of government debt hitting the market could trigger inflation. AIG to reduce debt by S25 billion NEW YORK - American International Group Inc. said Thursday it will reduce outstanding federal loans by $25 billion by giving the government a preferred stak

WASHINGTON - The Obama adminis- tration for the first time has transferred a Guantanamo Bay detainee into the Unit- ed States, flying the suspect to New Yon. early Thesday to face federal charges in the 1998 East Af- rica embassy bombings. US. Marshals took cus- tody of Ahmed Ghailani, a Tanzanian, at

V WINE SPECIALS limited Tit, Good ORO 07 CS ;1011 00:1111 Smknoft ea urn mantra lest sM Ralf $1599 1,76L R114148 Risplaill amino:Ann ; Burnett's Vodka " Baeardl Light GOld $1099 I I I I t.75L - • '16" 0 • • m i int nn frb: PG01110 "467" t s•PriimalM 1.0 marl nt AsIarfratal

experience in the administration of criminal justice both on the state and on the federal level. I was employed as an Assistant District Attorney in New York County from February 1962 until October 1965. One of the investigations I was responsible for was the death of Malcolm X. From 1965 until 1969 I was employ

neth Star Lilly Ann Sanchez Dal Vt.911O9LBITIM34oroatAll(32nO-13:51) FOWLAR Win &SWETT PA. EFTA00214703 Doc -B7 -07 04:55m Froe-fowlsr -Whits Burnett 3057609201 T-966 P 003/004 F-976 Affirms Oars I. Jeffrey B. Epstein do hereby re-affum the Noo-P:o see =on Ayer:lac it acid Ack.letatra to tun

ditionally, general jurisdic- tion could be appropriate for the SAAR Network entities having offices in Virgi- nia. Id, 1227. Accordingly, the SAAR Network's motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice. The parties are to en- gage in jurisdictional discovery to deter- mine which of the Network's entit

s subsequent decision in Kilbunz v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 376 F.3d 1123 (D.C.Cir.2004), effectively overrules the holding in Burnett IL See Kilburn, 376 F.3d at 1129 (evaluating a claim under § 1605(a)(7) and holding the requirement for jurisdictional causation was proximate cau

Attacks on September 11, 2001, 392 F.Supp.2d 539 (2005) 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789 To establish personal jurisdiction based on a conspiracy theory under New York’s long-arm statute, plaintiffs must make a prima facie showing of conspiracy and allege facts warranting an inference that defendant was a member of th

tate a claim. Other Defendants move to dismiss the complaints for failure to state a claim. Tarik Hamdi and Abdulrahman Alamoudi move to dismiss the Burnett and Federal complaints. Success Foundation moves to dismiss the Burnett complaint. The Burnett Plaintiffs denominate certain Defendants as the “SAAR

ns, even when that discretion is abused). Accordingly, the Court finds SHC is immune from suit in this litigation. Its motions to dismiss the Ashton, Burnett, and Federal complaints for lack subject matter jurisdiction are granted. 2. Prince Salman and Prince Naif M11 Similarly, even if Plaintiffs adequat

enewal pending con- clusion of jurisdictional discovery on that issue, © & KEY NUMBER SYSTEM 40oms In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 Burnett v. Al Baraka Inv. & Dev. Corp. Ashton v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army Tremsky v. Qsama Bin Laden Salvo v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army Burnett v. Al Baraka Inv. &

exception of FSIA; 7 a, survivors failed to make prima facie showing necessary to establish person- al jurisdiction over Princes and others under New York’s long-arm statute; (8 nai modified due process standard appro- priate for mass torts would not be applied to question of personal juris- diction;

(S.D.N.Y.). Plaintiffs in these cases filed consolidated responses to Prince Sultan’s and Prince Turki’s motions. In Plaintiffs’ words, the New York Burnett action is materially identical to the D.C. Burnett action and was filed as a “prophylactic’’ measure in the event the D.C. court found that it lacked

6.1, appellants certify as follows: 11-3509 (Ashton v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army): Appellants are natural persons. 11-3503, 11-3505, 11-3506, 11-3507 (Burnett v. Al Baraka Investment & Development Corp.): Appellants are natural persons. 11-3508 (Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. v. Akida Bank Private Limited): App

United States. 5. Whether plaintiffs’ intentional tort claims related to the September 11, 2001 attacks in Virginia and Pennsylvania are subject to New York’s one-year statute of limitations. *8 6. Whether plaintiffs’ intentional tort claims related to the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York, Virginia,