Epstein Secrets

TY OF ThE FSTAT1 $1,10n 000.)0 1). The said patiticners. Chicstiaa Kjaer. Furst, Pelle iundgaard and 1.:n.4marj have paid deb: the decedent in the Virgin Island! ...rich have come to the.: !notice, and accept the esette in the Islands clearl,•. i simply and unconditionally, indcing the said Christian Kjual

nd interest in and to the following described real pro- perty: "CS a te , 3 y 76' • — 1. The Island known as Great St. James Island / 74. in the United States Virgin islands and being located off the southeastern tip of the Island of St. Thomas, United States virgin Islands, and as shown on tax maps nos. 1-098-

Public EFTA00805288 NOTED IN THE CADASTRAL RECORDS FOR COUNTRY / TOWN PROPER; Y, BOOK FOR GREAT ST. JAMES ISLAND NO. 6A RED HOOK QUARTER ST. THOMAS VIRGIN ISLANDS x essor Office / Cadastral Division T RY 21 , 2016 . - • • !the lieutenant Governor / Public SU ATTEST: ': k herebycertiffedthettheabove ment

laint must put the defendant on fair notice of the claims being brought against him or her. Finn v. Adams, No. ST-16-CV-752, 2018 WL 3756421, at *4 (V.I. Super. Aug. 6, 2018). A statute of limitations defense is an affirmative defense that must be raised in a defendant's first responsive pleading, which i

Paneling Inc. Civil No. ST-10-CV-443 Memorandum Opinion Page 2 of 11 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, a resident of the Virgin Islands,2 is the sole member of Plaintiff L.S.J., LLC. L.S.J.3 owns Little St. James, which is an island off of the southeast coast of St. Thomas. In 2005, E

nstallation of the cabinets, in performance of its contract with Molyneux, were to benefit Epstein and L.S.J., and would be used in a library in the Virgin Islands.' On July 30, 2010, Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in this action, alleging that the cabinetry installation had not been properly completed, that t

iction is proper under section 4903(a)(2). All that is required to satisfy section 4903(a)(2) is that a "contract be performed, at least in part, in the virgin Islands and that the cause of action arise out of the contract."31 If a defendant knows that the ultimate destination of its goods will be the Virgin Island

egations and construes factual disputes in favor of the non-moving party. Bertrand v. Cordther Enters., Inc., ST-OS-CV-457, 2010 WL 2507305, at 418 (V.I. Super. Ct June 2, 2010) (citing Paradise Motors, Inc. v. Toyota de Puerto Rico Corp., 314 F. Supp. 2d 495, 499 (DN.I. 2004)). 3 L.S.J. is a Delaware cor

fy a stay of discovery. As this Court knows, the program cannot go forward due to the current criminal activity lien on Jeffrey Epstein's Estate in the U.S. Virgin Islands ("USVI"). See Tr. of Feb. II, 2020 Conf. at 36:15-18 ("[T]he two cases where discovery has been stayed, in light of what's happening in the Virgin

Islands ("USVI"). See Tr. of Feb. II, 2020 Conf. at 36:15-18 ("[T]he two cases where discovery has been stayed, in light of what's happening in the Virgin Islands, they may end up unstayed."). But even if the lien were lifted and the program could go forward tomorrow, both Epstein's Estate (Maxwell's co-defend

at issue in that case, and the case would require discovery concerning such conduct. Maxwell v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, et at, ST-20-CV-155 (V.I. Super. Ct.); Willie v. Amerada Hess Corp., 66 V.I. 23, 92 (Super. Ct. 2017) (common law indemnification is only available "where an innocent party is hel