Epstein Secrets

our discussion, New York requests authorization for all those listed in the cc line to use EAN 457356.1 EFTA01653264 for the Operational Travel to the U.S. Virgin Islands (St. Thomas). The tentative travel period will be from 08/08/2019 to 08/14/2019. We will be renting approximately 13 rental cars. Thanks, Sean SS

loria Chavez < Joe Picarello < ; John Zerafa Rosemarie Muckenthaler (FBI) < (FBI) < R. (NY) (FBI) <II MM.; Markheim, Jeffrey D. (NY) (FBI) < Cunningham, Karen M. (NY) (FBI) <I Osborn, Michael A. (NY) (FBI) < • Monaghan, Sara (NY) (FBI) Estok, Andrea L. (NY) (FBI) < Stantzos, Christopher P. (NY) (

Sean From: Watson, Sean P. (NY) (FBI) Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2019 9:13:26 AM To: Toro, Thalia (NY) (FBI) Cc: Mitchell, Brian S. (NY) (FBI) Cunningham, Karen M. (NY) (FBI Turanslcy, Stacy M. (NY) (FBI Maguire, Kelly (NY) Graves, Rachel L. (NY) (FBI J. L. (NY) (FBI) ; Thompson, Thomas A. (NY) (FB

relations with Dershowitz on numerous occasions while she was a minor, not only in Florida but also on private planes, in New York, New Mexico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. In addition to being a participant in the abuse of Jane Doe #3 and other minors, Deshowitz was an eye-witness to the sexual abuse of many other mi

, or to imply any duty or obligation to any victim or other person for the breach of which the United States ... could be held liable in damages."); Cunningham. U.S Dept of Justice, 961 F. Supp. 2d. 226 (D.D.C. 2013) ("[The] CVRA expressly disallows a suit for damages against the federal government or its

stating in her previously filed affidavit that it is her recollection that she witnessed former President Bill Clinton on Jeffrey Epstein’s island in the United States Virgin Islands (“USVI’)'. Setting aside Defendant Dershowitz’s baseless claims of perjury, Ms. Giuffre agrees that her confidential deposition should be provided t

“absence of records” response does not mean that records do not exist. It simply means that in the course of the search, no records were found. See Cunningham v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 961 F.Supp. 2d 226, 236 (D.C. 2013) (court reasoning that “t]he adequacy of a search is measured by a standard of reasonab