Epstein Secrets

ught "the testimony of all witnesses before any grand jury which investigated this matter which is favorable to this defendant." In its answer to Rich's motion, the Govern- ment stated that it would provide grand jury transcripts only insofar as it was re- quired to do so by 18 U.S.C. . 8500. The tr

tivities that substantially affect interstate commerce. See also United States I Ili 514 U.S. 549, 558-59, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 1 1 L. .2d 626 (1995); Reich, 125 S.Ct. at 2215 (Scalia, J., concurring) (noting that *1103 for over thirty years, "our cases have mechanically recited that the Commerce Claus

1 lied *1112 to interstate commerce cases. See 514 U.S. at 558-59, 115 S.Ct. 1624; Morrison, U.S. Page 12 at 609-14, 120 S.Ct. 1740; see also Raich, 125 S.Ct. at 2215 (Scabs, l., concurring) (noting that for over thirty years, "our cases have mechanically recited that the Commerce Clause permi

estic commerce comprised of "three general categories of regulation in which 1 Congress is authorized engage under its com- merce power,"Gonzales Reich, 545U.S. I, ---, 125 S.Ct. 2195, 2205, 16 L.Ed.2d I (2005):(I) the use of the channels of interstate commerce; (2) the instrumentalities of inters

evada to work as prosti- tute. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2422. Claude Hanks, Clayton, Mo., Hanks Tay- lor & Suddarth, Clayton, Mo., filed brief, for appellant, Pelton. Irl B. Saris, St. Louis, Ma, for appellant Rich. David M. Rosen, Ant. U. S. Atty., ar- gued, Robert D. Kingaland, U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., o

prostitution in Win- nemucca, Nevada. According to Bray, she was present at Rich's apartment when Rich and Pelton made arrangements for this trip. Pelton called an acquaintance of his at Penny's Cozy Corner and arranged for were alleged to have occurred on September 29 and 30, 1976, in connection wi

hoice to widen his access was made, if not to get rich, to empower himself. The Second Decision The se

cure debriefing room, he said that he had information that Russia would find interesting, but he wanted money in return. What interested me about the Pelton case was that Cherkashin proceeded to recruit Pelton, even though he was no longer working at the NSA and no longer had access to @ the NSA. In addi

urse grab them.” The final recruitment I asked Cherkashin about was that of Ronald Pelton, the civilian employee of the NSA who had retired in 1979. Pelton had left the NSA without taking any classified documents with him. After retiring, he had financial difficulties, and he sought to get money from the

aid, but some whistle-blowers also receive paid a rich bounty for their work. Indeed, under federal laws

urse grab them.” The final recruitment I asked Cherkashin about was that of Ronald Pelton, the civilian employee of the NSA who had retired in 1979. Pelton had left the NSA without taking any classified documents with him. After retiring, he had financial difficulties, and he sought to get money from the

return. What interested me about the Pelton case was that Cherkashin proceeded to recruit Pelton even though he was no longer working at the NSA, and Pelton no longer had access to the NSA. In addition, since the FBI had 24 hour surveillance on the embassy, Pelton had almost certainly been photographed en