Epstein Secrets

legal hearing, asking a judge to cut the filthy-rich felon a break on the severity of his sex-offender

E OF NEW • YORK, • App. Div. No. 6081 Respondent, • On Appeal from New York Supreme Court, • New York County, Index No. 30129/10 - against - (Pickholz, J.) JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. : x MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO UNSEAL APPELLATE BRIEFS DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LIP

ts and designated Epstein as a level three sex offender. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d at 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d at 240. At a hearing preceding her ruling, Justice Pickholz told the Assistant District Attorney that she had "never seen the 3 4811-3721-9459v.2 3930°33-000039 EFTA00805354 prosecutor's office do anythin

because "there are no real victims here." Id. Ex. C. In January 2011, the judge presiding over the sex-offender registration proceedings, Justice Ruth Pickholz, rejected ADA Gaffney's arguments and designated Epstein as a level three sex offender. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d at 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d at 240. At a hearing

United States Attorneys Martin G. Weinberg, PC Attorney for Defendant Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Attorneys for Defendant BY: REID WEINGARTEN MARC FERNICH Attorney for Defendant JAMES BROCHIN Attorney for Defendant JOSEPH JAFFE Attorney for Defendant SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00079746

2.1 25 would have been charged is particularly rich in this case. There are plumes of smoke as to th

he Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders New York state and then in state court by the courts and, particularly, a decision of the Honorable Justice Ruth Pickholz on our about January 18, 2011. I believe that decision was appealed to the New York State Appellate Division and was unanimously upheld. I read th

to the New York State Appellate Division and was unanimously upheld. I read this morning a copy of the transcript of the proceedings before Judge Pickholz which I'm likely to place on the docket after today's session. And the question is for each side. First of all, they're free to comment on my descr

United States Attorneys Martin G. Weinberg, PC Attorney for Defendant Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Attorneys for Defendant BY: REID WEINGARTEN MARC FERNICH Attorney for Defendant JAMES BROCHIN Attorney for Defendant JOSEPH JAFFE Attorney for Defendant SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00095388

2.1 25 would have been charged is particularly rich in this case. There are plumes of smoke as to th

to the New York State Appellate Division and was unanimously upheld. I read this morning a copy of the transcript of the proceedings before Judge Pickholz which I'm likely to place on the docket after today's session. And the question is for each side. First of all, they're free to comment on my descr

he Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders New York state and then in state court by the courts and, particularly, a decision of the Honorable Justice Ruth Pickholz on our about January 18, 2011. I believe that decision was appealed to the New York State Appellate Division and was unanimously upheld. I read th

raphs and fingerprints to the siaeortmont, along rich the Informationprow:clod by the stifled effynder_

of SORA Level Determination Hearing (with attachment), dated August 26, 2010 A71 EFTA00792402 iii PAGE Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz Requesting a Continuance of the Hearing, dated September 9, 2010 A77 Letter from Supreme Court to Sex Offender Registry Unit Enclosing Final Det

upreme Court Part 66 III Centre Street New York, NY 10013 FacsrmM www.lOrklang com September 7, 2010 / Re: SCID No. 30129-2010 Dear Justice Pickholz: I am writing regarding the hearing for Mr. Jeffrey Epstein in the above-referenced matter, which is currently scheduled for 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday

ndard. Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles %rich Palo Alto San Francisco Shanghai Washington.

rey E. Epstein, who is scheduled to appear in New York Supreme Court, Part 66, on Tuesday, November 9, 2010 for a hearing before the Honorable Ruth Pickholz pursuant to New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), N.Y. Correction Law § 168 et seq. (McKinney 2008). To follow up on our conversation in

a $56 million Manhattan mansion and a network of rich and powerful friends. But in his final days, Mr.

earing in New York Supreme Court. "I am a little overwhelmed because I have never seen the prosecutor's office do anything like this," Justice Ruth Pickholz told Ms. Gaffney, according to a transcript of the hearing. Ms. Gaffney agreed that it was "incredibly unusual for us to make a downward argument,"

a $56 million Manhattan mansion and a network of rich and powerful friends. But in his final days, Mr.

earing in New York Supreme Court. "I am a little overwhelmed because I have never seen the prosecutor's office do anything like this," Justice Ruth Pickholz told Ms. Gaffney, according to a transcript of the hearing. Ms. Gaffney agreed that it was "incredibly unusual for us to make a downward argument,"

Reference number at 212-750-1176 EFTA00315363 Rich Kahn From: Darren Indyke [ Sent: Friday, Janu

g requirements. 9/01/10 1.50 Jay P Lefkowitz. P.C. Review timing issues: follow up with DA. 9/02/10 1.00 Matthew 0 Solum Draft letter to Judge Pickholz re extension. 9/02/10 2.00 Jay P Lefkowitz. P.C. Review timing issues: reach out to Court to reschedule: review file. 9/07/10 .75 Matthew 0 So

THE STATE OF NEW YORK, : App. Div. No. 6081 Respondent, ; On Appeal from New York Supreme Court, : New York County, Index No. 30129/10 - against - : (Pickholz, J.) JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, ; Defendant-Appellant. x NOTICE OF MOTION BY NYP HOLDINGS, INC. TQ UNSEAL APPELLATE BRIEFS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon t

legal hearing, asking a judge to cut the filthy- rich felon a break on the severity of his sex- offende

ister as Level 3 — which would require he travel to New York every 90 days and check in with cops. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016459 --- PAGE BREAK --- Judge Ruth Pickholz was flabbergasted. She couldn’t understand why the DA would want to go easy on Epstein, after the New York State Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders