Epstein Secrets

a et Sconce -i ISO SeclIIINS Commoners PROPERTY RICH T9 3 120 Cannabis 71130 Pawn 3 $40 Tin:knurl

Movants rely on a decision from the Southern District of Texas for the notion that CVRA rights apply prior to any prosecution. In United States v. BP Products North America, Inc., the district court reasoned that because § 3771(d)(3) provided for the assertion of CVRA rights "in the district court in which a defendant

ould violate the laws of this stale"); I:x parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); (where "t

Movants rely on a decision from the Southern District of Texas for the notion that CVRA rights apply prior to any prosecution. In United States v. BP Products North America, Inc., the district court reasoned that because § 3771(d)(3) provided for the assertion of CVRA rights "in the district court in which a defendant

ould violate the laws of this stale"); I:x parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); (where "t

Movants rely on a decision from the Southern District of Texas for the notion that CVRA rights apply prior to any prosecution. In United States v. BP Products North America, Inc., the district court reasoned that because § 3771(d)(3) provided for the assertion of CVRA rights "in the district court in which a defendant

would violate the laws of this state"); Kr pane Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); (where "t

ng its broad discretion." Id. at 395. In Dean, the government sought and obtained an gh pane order permitting it to negotiate a plea agreement with BP Products North America, without first consulting with the victims, individuals injured and survivors of those killed in a refinery explosion. A plea agreement was ultimat

ion that crime victims had no right to confer with prosecutors until after the Department had reached and signed a plea agreement with a corporation (BP Products North America) whose illegal actions had resulted in the deaths of fifteen workers in an oil refinery explosion. Of course, this position meant that the victims co

od should not be held hostage by litiga- tion and anti-grazing special interest groups. I thank my colleagues, Sen- ators ENZI, CRAPO, HATCH, HELLER, RIScH, and THUNE, in supporting ranch- ing families and this legislation. Mr. President, I ask unanimous con- sent to have printed in the REcorpD the arti