Epstein Secrets

ously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons." F.D. Rich Co. v. Industrial Lumber Co., 417 U.S. 116, 129

l Rule 2090-1(A). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 930 By: W SCOTT J. LINK (FBN Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein 12 EFTA00794267 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny,Scarola, Bamhart & Shipley, P.A. yard Counsel for Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Brittany N. Henderson Edwards Pottinger LLC ue,

s; suggested introducing the "15 yr-old" to his rich friend for "first-time" male-to- male sex; arran

ppeal dismissed due to waiver of right to appeal. 2422(b) Not Consummated Sting 51 EFTA00224185 FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE- U.S. I Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193 (11th Cir. 2005) Internet Internet chat room; defendant's screen name was "Obesseddad11"; informed undercover agent that he was

ers of traditionally state concern, will continue to arise and will be answered case-by-case. As Justice O'Connor said in her dissent in Gonzales'. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 47 (2005), ". . . the task is to identify a mode of analysis that allows Congress to regulate more than nothing ... and less than every

ary Committee held a hearing regarding child endangerment via the intemet. See H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 104-458, at 193 (1996), quoted in United States I Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193, 1197 (11th Cir. 2005); see also K. Seto, "Note: How Should Legislation Deal with Children and the Victims and Perpetrators of Cyber

ers of traditionally state concern, will continue to arise and will be answered case-by-case. As Justice O'Connor said in her dissent in Gonzales I Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 47 (2005), ". . . the task is to identify a mode of analysis that allows Congress to regulate more than nothing ... and less than every

y Committee held a hearing regarding child endangerment via the Internet. See H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 104-458, at 193 (1996), quoted in United States ' Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193, 1197 (11th Cir. 2005); see also K. Seto, "Note: How Should Legislation Deal with Children and the Victims and Perpetrators of Cyber

who provided sexual services for Epstein and his rich friends while underage, saw the photograph and de

Fowler White Burnett )p, ATTORNEYS AT LAW -'"" March 17, 2011 VIA FACSIMILE (561) 686-6300 AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Re: Espstein v. Rothstein, et al Our File No.:

rs of traditionally state concern, will continue to arise and will be answered case-by-case. As Justice O'Connor said in her dissent in Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 47 (2005), ". . the task is to identify a mode of analysis that allows Congress to regulate more than nothing . . . and less than every

ary Committee held a hearing regarding child endangerment via the internet. See H.R. Cont Rep. No. 104458, at 193 (1996), quoted in United States v. Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193, 1197 (11th Cir. 2005); see also K. Seto, "Note: How Should Legislation Deal with Children and the Victims and Perpetrators of Cyber

would violate the laws of this state"); Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508, 515 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); (wh

tion for mandamus that would have to be heard within 72 hours." At least one prisoner has filed exactly this type of suit, not once, but twice. See Searcy' NFN Pale!; 2007 WL 1875802 (D.S.C. June 27, 2007) (prisoner who alleged he was victim of assault filed suit under CVRA attempting to force U.S. Att

s; suggested introducing the "15 yr-old" to his rich friend for "first-time" male-to- male sex; arran

ICO One defendant sentenced to 40 yrs; other to 30 yrs. Affirmed. 53 EFTA00226343 COURT dale ' FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE"-•r. US I Searcy, Inter . et Internet chat room; defendant's screen 2422(b) 418 F.3d 1193 (11th Cir. 2005) Sting name was "Obesseddad11"; informed undercover

the core of the architecture functioning in this rich but limited domain, we can attempt to extend it--

ary Committee held a hearing regarding child endangerment via the Internet. See H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 104.458, at 193 (1996), quoted in United States' Searcy, 418 I3d 1193, 1197 (11ih Cir. 2005); see also K. Seto, "Note: How Should Legislation Deal with Children and the Victims and Perpetrators of Cybers