Epstein Secrets

lay ,Pattet. (74) of Becent&T, 20, TH DONALD W. HAFELE CIR T CO UDGE SERVICE LIST Jack Scaro

, 48 So. 3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (probative value outweighed by prejudicial effect when evidence improperly becomes focus of trial); Maldonado v. Allstate Ins. Co., 789 So. 2d 464 (Ha. 2d DCA 2001) (probative value of bicyclist's status as an illegal alien was outweighed by unfair prejudice, confusion of the i

d others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (herei

d." Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So. 2d 638, 644 (Fla.1999). "This rule applies in cases of summary judgments as well." Landis v. Allstate Ins. Co., 546 So. 2d 1051, 1053 (Fla. 1989); see also Rivernider, supra (holding that although trial judge erred in granting summary judgment based upon the

Application for Search Warrant on Jeffrey Epstein's home 32. Tape recording or transcript of recording of conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and George Rush 33. Notepads found in Jeffrey Epstein's home and/or during trash pulls outside of his home during criminal investigation 39. All statements made b

, 48 So. 3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (probative value outweighed by prejudicial effect when evidence improperly becomes focus of trial); Maldonado v. Allstate Ins. Co., 789 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (probative value of bicyclist's status as an illegal alien was outweighed by unfair prejudice, confusion of the

tice requires." Id.; see also Logitech Cargo v. J.W. Perry, 817 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). 15.

are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in the case in which the discovery is sought. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b)(1); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston, 655 So. 2d 91, 94 (Fla. 1995). 10. "Pretrial discovery was implemented to simplify the issues in a case, to eliminate the element of